These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1895772)

  • 21. Perspectives on Cruzan: the sirens' lure of invented consent -- a critique of autonomy-based surrogate decisionmaking for legally-incapacitated older persons.
    Bopp J; Avila D
    Hastings Law J; 1991 Mar; 42(3):779-815. PubMed ID: 11652587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Patient Self-Determination Act: sources of concern for nurses.
    Mezey M; Evans LK; Golub ZD; Murphy E; White GB
    Nurs Outlook; 1994; 42(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 8202395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Surrogate decisions at risk. The Cruzan case.
    Thomasma DC
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1990 May; 38(5):603-4. PubMed ID: 2110204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Approximating informed consent and fostering communication: the anatomy of an advance directive.
    Olick RS
    J Clin Ethics; 1991; 2(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 1773111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Life and death choices after Cruzan.
    Gostin L
    Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):9-12. PubMed ID: 1895774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Substitute consent. Reconciling negative treatment and consent to routine medical treatment.
    Sappington GM
    J Leg Med; 1986 Sep; 7(3):341-55. PubMed ID: 3490528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Risk-benefit ratio: the soft underbelly of patient autonomy.
    Gunn AE
    Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(2):139-53. PubMed ID: 1938331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Withdrawing treatment.
    Quigley FM
    Focus Crit Care; 1990 Dec; 17(6):464-5, 468. PubMed ID: 2265725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Is the Patient Self-Determination Act appropriate for elderly persons hospitalized for depression?
    Ganzini L; Lee MA; Heintz RT; Bloom JD
    J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 8490219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The right to death.
    Dworkin R
    New York Rev Books; 1991 Jan; ():14-7. PubMed ID: 11653244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Does autonomy require informed and specific refusal of life-sustaining medical treatment?
    Bradley GV; Rouse F
    Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(3):301-35. PubMed ID: 2613492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Beyond misguided paternalism: resuscitating the right to refuse medical treatment.
    Malloy SE
    Wake Forest Law Rev; 1998; 33():1035-91. PubMed ID: 11660805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Decisions to abate life-sustaining treatment for nonautonomous patients. Ethical standards and legal liability for physicians after Cruzan.
    Weir RF; Gostin L
    JAMA; 1990 Oct; 264(14):1846-53. PubMed ID: 2402044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. When is there a constitutional "right to die"? When is there no constitutional "right to live".
    Kamisar Y
    Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1203-42. PubMed ID: 11652581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The insane root takes reason prisoner: the supreme court and the right to die.
    Annas GJ
    Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1993; 8(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 8453236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Death can be proud.
    Butt L; Rothman J
    HEC Forum; 1995; 7(2-3):81-93. PubMed ID: 10156750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Identifying appropriate decision-makers and standards for decision.
    Pollock SG
    Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):63-5. PubMed ID: 1895767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Patient Self-Determination Act: a legal solution for a moral dilemma.
    Welie JV
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1992; 1(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 1342851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ethical principles in critical care.
    Luce JM
    JAMA; 1990 Feb; 263(5):696-700. PubMed ID: 2296126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1990 Jun; 110():2841-92. PubMed ID: 12041283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.