These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1895772)
41. Nancy Cruzan in China. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):39-41. PubMed ID: 2228588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. From the Office of the General Counsel. The right to die after Cruzan. Orentlicher D JAMA; 1990 Nov; 264(18):2444-6. PubMed ID: 2232004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The Nancy Cruzan case. McCormick RA Midwest Med Ethics; 1989; 5(1-2):2-31. PubMed ID: 12091960 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Beyond autonomy: judicial restraint and the legal limits necessary to uphold the Hippocratic tradition and preserve the ethical integrity of the medical profession. Murphy JJ J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():451-84. PubMed ID: 10126946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Assessing quality of life: a response to Professor Kamisar. Robertson JA Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1243-52. PubMed ID: 11652582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. The Cruzan case. Rouse F Lancet; 1991 Jan; 337(8733):105-6. PubMed ID: 1670690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. USCC brief in Nancy Cruzan case: continued nutrition and hydration urged. United States Catholic Conference Origins; 1989 Oct; 19(21):345-51. PubMed ID: 11652554 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Patient rights and dying: policy restraint and the states. Keigher SM Health Soc Work; 1994 Nov; 19(4):298-303. PubMed ID: 7813969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law. Allsopp ME Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Futile medical treatment: a review of the ethical arguments and legal holdings. Kapp MB J Gen Intern Med; 1994 Mar; 9(3):170-7. PubMed ID: 8195918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. When should the state step aside? Terminating treatment for PVS victims. Harvey JC; Quinn KP; Johnson SH Commonweal; 1990 May; 117(9):286-94. PubMed ID: 11652558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. The "value of human life" and "the right to death": some reflections on Cruzan and Ronald Dworkin. Finnis J South Ill Univ Law J; 1993; 17():559-71. PubMed ID: 11656302 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Does the doctor know best--what is the scope for non-consensual treatment? Francis R Med Leg J; 1995; 63 ( Pt 1)():7-22; discussion 22-5. PubMed ID: 7739420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination. Gilbert LJ J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Legalistic ethics and the lingering doubt about withdrawing life-supports. Vaux K J Allied Health; 1991; 20(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 1761409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. The Cruzan decision and critical care physicians. Sprung CL Crit Care Med; 1991 May; 19(5):598-9. PubMed ID: 2026020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. In the Supreme Court of the United States. No. 88-1503. Nancy Beth Cruzan, by her parents and co-guardians, Lester L. Cruzan, et ux., petitioners, v. Director, Missouri Department Health, et al. Issues Law Med; 1990; 5(4):453-78. PubMed ID: 2108100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. The due process of dying. Flick MR Calif Law Rev; 1991 Jul; 79(4):1161-7. PubMed ID: 11659478 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]