154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1895775)
1. Advance directives under state law and judicial decisions.
Areen J
Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):91-100. PubMed ID: 1895775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Advance directives: where are we heading after Cruzan?
Rouse F
Law Med Health Care; 1990; 18(4):353-9. PubMed ID: 2089188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health: a clear and convincing call for comprehensive legislation to protect incompetent patients' rights.
Suhr JN
Am Univ Law Rev; 1991; 40(4):1477-519. PubMed ID: 11651350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination.
Gilbert LJ
J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Securing patients' right to refuse medical care: in praise of the Cruzan decision.
Emanuel EJ
Am J Med; 1992 Mar; 92(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 1546730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A retrospective on Cruzan.
Meisel A
Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(4):340-53. PubMed ID: 11651557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law.
Allsopp ME
Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A line less reasonable: Cruzan and the looming debate over active euthanasia.
Grant ER; Cleaver CA
Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):99-256. PubMed ID: 11651215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Protecting the right to die: the Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990.
Mulholland KC
Harvard J Legis; 1991; 28(2):609-30. PubMed ID: 11651225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health.
U.S. Supreme Court
Wests Supreme Court Report; 1990 Jun; 110():2841-92. PubMed ID: 12041283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Essays in the aftermath of Cruzan.
White PD
J Med Philos; 1992 Dec; 17(6):563-71. PubMed ID: 1479306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Justices find a right to die, but the majority sees need for clear proof of intent.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1990 Jun; ():A1, A18, A19. PubMed ID: 11646758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Death in the legislature: inventing legal tools for autonomy.
Sabatino CP
Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(2):309-39. PubMed ID: 11652237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The right to death.
Dworkin R
New York Rev Books; 1991 Jan; ():14-7. PubMed ID: 11653244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Another right-to-die case poses new questions.
N Y Times Web; 1991 Jan; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11646799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Family matters: is big brother your next-of-kin?
Lomasky LE
Reason; 1990 Nov; 22(6):36-9. PubMed ID: 11652569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Letting patients die: legal and moral reflections.
Kadish SH
Calif Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 80(4):857-88. PubMed ID: 11652646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cruzan and the constitutional status of nontreatment decisions for incompetent patients.
Robertson JA
Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1139-202. PubMed ID: 11652580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Cruzan decision -- a surgeon's perspective.
McNoble DJ
Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1990; 20(4):569-610. PubMed ID: 11652628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Public policy in the wake of Cruzan: a case study of New York's health care proxy law.
Miller TE
Law Med Health Care; 1990; 18(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 2089189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
