BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18957763)

  • 21. Refining sweet sorghum to ethanol and sugar: economic trade-offs in the context of North China.
    Gnansounou E; Dauriat A; Wyman CE
    Bioresour Technol; 2005 Jun; 96(9):985-1002. PubMed ID: 15668196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative assessment of single-stage and two-stage anaerobic digestion for the treatment of thin stillage.
    Nasr N; Elbeshbishy E; Hafez H; Nakhla G; El Naggar MH
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 May; 111():122-6. PubMed ID: 22366605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Anaerobic co-digestion of sludge with other organic wastes in small wastewater treatment plants: an economic considerations evaluation.
    Pavan P; Bolzonella D; Battistoni E; Cecchi F
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(10):45-53. PubMed ID: 18048976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Enhanced treatment efficiency of an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (ASBR) for cassava stillage with high solids content.
    Luo G; Xie L; Zhou Q
    J Biosci Bioeng; 2009 Jun; 107(6):641-5. PubMed ID: 19447342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Anaerobic digestion of stillage to produce bioenergy in the sugarcane-to-ethanol industry.
    Fuess LT; Garcia ML
    Environ Technol; 2014; 35(1-4):333-9. PubMed ID: 24600872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The valuation of malnutrition in the mono-digestion of maize silage by anaerobic batch tests.
    Hinken L; Urban I; Haun E; Urban I; Weichgrebe D; Rosenwinkel KH
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(7):1453-9. PubMed ID: 18957759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bioethanol, biohydrogen and biogas production from wheat straw in a biorefinery concept.
    Kaparaju P; Serrano M; Thomsen AB; Kongjan P; Angelidaki I
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 May; 100(9):2562-8. PubMed ID: 19135361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources.
    Ward AJ; Hobbs PJ; Holliman PJ; Jones DL
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Nov; 99(17):7928-40. PubMed ID: 18406612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Process engineering economics of bioethanol production.
    Galbe M; Sassner P; Wingren A; Zacchi G
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 108():303-27. PubMed ID: 17541520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Detailed monitoring of two biogas plants and mechanical solid-liquid separation of fermentation residues.
    Bauer A; Mayr H; Hopfner-Sixt K; Amon T
    J Biotechnol; 2009 Jun; 142(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 19480948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of reactor configuration on biogas production from wheat straw hydrolysate.
    Kaparaju P; Serrano M; Angelidaki I
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Dec; 100(24):6317-23. PubMed ID: 19647428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Coproduction of bioethanol with other biofuels.
    Ahring BK; Westermann P
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 108():289-302. PubMed ID: 17676282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The environmental sustainability of anaerobic digestion as a biomass valorization technology.
    De Meester S; Demeyer J; Velghe F; Peene A; Van Langenhove H; Dewulf J
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Oct; 121():396-403. PubMed ID: 22864176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Using bioprocess stoichiometry to build a plant-wide mass balance based steady-state WWTP model.
    Ekama GA
    Water Res; 2009 May; 43(8):2101-20. PubMed ID: 19345392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optimisation of biogas production from anaerobic digestion of agro-industrial waste streams in Brazil.
    Boncz MA; Bezerra LP; Ide CN; Paulo PL
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(8):1659-64. PubMed ID: 19001722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Maximum use of resources present in domestic "used water".
    Verstraete W; Van de Caveye P; Diamantis V
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Dec; 100(23):5537-45. PubMed ID: 19577923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Establishing an energy balance for crop-based digestion.
    Salter A; Banks CJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(6):1053-60. PubMed ID: 19342799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A multi-criteria ranking of different technologies for the anaerobic digestion for energy recovery of the organic fraction of municipal solid wastes.
    Karagiannidis A; Perkoulidis G
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Apr; 100(8):2355-60. PubMed ID: 19119004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impacts of retrofitting analysis on first generation ethanol production: process design and techno-economics.
    Rajendran K; Rajoli S; Teichert O; Taherzadeh MJ
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2015 Feb; 38(2):389-97. PubMed ID: 25194465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development of a pilot scale anaerobic digester for biogas production from cow manure and whey mix.
    Comino E; Rosso M; Riggio V
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Nov; 100(21):5072-8. PubMed ID: 19559606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.