These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18958150)

  • 1. The multisensory attentional consequences of tool use: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Holmes NP; Spence C; Hansen PC; Mackay CE; Calvert GA
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3502. PubMed ID: 18958150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multisensory stimulation with or without saccades: fMRI evidence for crossmodal effects on sensory-specific cortices that reflect multisensory location-congruence rather than task-relevance.
    Macaluso E; Frith CD; Driver J
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jun; 26(2):414-25. PubMed ID: 15907299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retinotopic effects during spatial audio-visual integration.
    Meienbrock A; Naumer MJ; Doehrmann O; Singer W; Muckli L
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):531-9. PubMed ID: 16797610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field.
    Schwartz S; Vuilleumier P; Hutton C; Maravita A; Dolan RJ; Driver J
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Jun; 15(6):770-86. PubMed ID: 15459076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Processing of multisensory spatial congruency can be dissociated from working memory and visuo-spatial attention.
    Zimmer U; Macaluso E
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Sep; 26(6):1681-91. PubMed ID: 17880400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Crossmodal spatial influences of touch on extrastriate visual areas take current gaze direction into account.
    Macaluso E; Frith CD; Driver J
    Neuron; 2002 May; 34(4):647-58. PubMed ID: 12062047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hemifield effects of spatial attention in early human visual cortex.
    Kraft A; Kehrer S; Hagendorf H; Brandt SA
    Eur J Neurosci; 2011 Jun; 33(12):2349-58. PubMed ID: 21545658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Directing attention to locations and to sensory modalities: multiple levels of selective processing revealed with PET.
    Macaluso E; Frith CD; Driver J
    Cereb Cortex; 2002 Apr; 12(4):357-68. PubMed ID: 11884351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-modal congruency and visual capture in a visual elevation-discrimination task.
    Walton M; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Jan; 154(1):113-20. PubMed ID: 14579008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial tuning of tactile attention modulates visual processing within hemifields: an ERP investigation of crossmodal attention.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):402-10. PubMed ID: 16034566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Object-guided spatial attention in touch: holding the same object with both hands delays attentional selection.
    Gillmeister H; Adler J; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 May; 22(5):931-42. PubMed ID: 19413480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial attention can modulate audiovisual integration at multiple cortical and subcortical sites.
    Fairhall SL; Macaluso E
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Mar; 29(6):1247-57. PubMed ID: 19302160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selective spatial attention in vision and touch: unimodal and multimodal mechanisms revealed by PET.
    Macaluso E; Frith C; Driver J
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 May; 83(5):3062-75. PubMed ID: 10805701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial and cross-modal attention alter responses to unattended sensory information in early visual and auditory human cortex.
    Ciaramitaro VM; Buracas GT; Boynton GM
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Oct; 98(4):2399-413. PubMed ID: 17715196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tool use changes multisensory interactions in seconds: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task.
    Holmes NP; Calvert GA; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 183(4):465-76. PubMed ID: 17665178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From local inhibition to long-range integration: a functional dissociation of alpha-band synchronization across cortical scales in visuospatial attention.
    Doesburg SM; Green JJ; McDonald JJ; Ward LM
    Brain Res; 2009 Dec; 1303():97-110. PubMed ID: 19782056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time-varying cortical activations related to visual-tactile cross-modal links in spatial selective attention.
    Kida T; Inui K; Wasaka T; Akatsuka K; Tanaka E; Kakigi R
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 May; 97(5):3585-96. PubMed ID: 17360823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Overt spatial attention modulates multisensory selection.
    Jensen A; Merz S; Spence C; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Feb; 45(2):174-188. PubMed ID: 30589358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.