These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1895842)
21. Finding agreement to limit life-sustaining treatment for children who are in state custody. Savage T; Michalak DR Pediatr Nurs; 2001; 27(6):594-7. PubMed ID: 12024533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The right to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment: national trend and recent changes in Maryland law. Goldmeier KE MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1306-43. PubMed ID: 12599354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. "Let me go in peace". Agate J Doc Med Ethics; 1975; (5):. PubMed ID: 11661328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The right to die: medico-legal implications of In re Quinlan. Hirsh HL; Donovan RE Rutgers Law Rev; 1977; 30(2):267-303. PubMed ID: 11661462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client. Harner SR Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(4):869-98. PubMed ID: 12186076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Euthanasia in The Netherlands. Justifiable euthanasia. Admiraal PV Issues Law Med; 1988; 3(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 3378872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. It's our right to pull the plug. Bates RC Med Econ; 1977 May; 54(10):162-6. PubMed ID: 11661474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A debate on the ultimate self-determination. Baginski Y Caring; 1992 Jun; 11(6):34-8. PubMed ID: 10145631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Socially-assisted dying and people with disabilities: some emerging legal, medical, and policy implications. Blanck P; Kirschner K; Bienen L Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1997; 21(4):538-43. PubMed ID: 9287469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. On "Distinguishing among irrational suicide, rational suicide, and other forms of hastened death: implications for clinical practice" by Cavin P. Leeman, M.D. Brendel R Psychosomatics; 2009; 50(3):193-4. PubMed ID: 19567755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Resuscitation and the euthanasia debate. Rozovsky LE Dimens Health Serv; 1975 Nov; 52(11):8-9. PubMed ID: 11661241 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The dilemma of euthanasia. Abyad AR J Med Liban; 1994; 42(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 7616561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Practices of anaesthesiologists with regard to withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill in Turkey. Iyilikçi L; Erbayraktar S; Gökmen N; Ellidokuz H; Kara HC; Günerli A Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2004 Apr; 48(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 15025608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Controlled NHBD protocol for a fully conscious person: when death is intended as an end in itself and it has its own end. Spike J J Clin Ethics; 2000; 11(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 10904894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Consent, volition, and professional restraint: the patient who wants to die. Lang DA Semin Anesth; 1991 Sep; 10(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 11651355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The 'crucible of the bedside'. Med World News; 1985 May; 26(9):112-4. PubMed ID: 11645551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Withholding and withdrawal of life support from critically ill patients. Luce JM West J Med; 1997 Dec; 167(6):411-6. PubMed ID: 9426480 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Futility. Hargrove MD J La State Med Soc; 1994 Sep; 146(9):377-8. PubMed ID: 7996032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Death by default. Lindgren J Law Contemp Probl; 1993; 56(3):185-254. PubMed ID: 10129268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]