191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1895842)
21. Finding agreement to limit life-sustaining treatment for children who are in state custody.
Savage T; Michalak DR
Pediatr Nurs; 2001; 27(6):594-7. PubMed ID: 12024533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. When abstract moralizing runs amok.
Lachs J
J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(1):10-2; discussion 13-5. PubMed ID: 8003716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The right to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment: national trend and recent changes in Maryland law.
Goldmeier KE
MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1306-43. PubMed ID: 12599354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. "Let me go in peace".
Agate J
Doc Med Ethics; 1975; (5):. PubMed ID: 11661328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The right to die: medico-legal implications of In re Quinlan.
Hirsh HL; Donovan RE
Rutgers Law Rev; 1977; 30(2):267-303. PubMed ID: 11661462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client.
Harner SR
Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(4):869-98. PubMed ID: 12186076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Euthanasia in The Netherlands. Justifiable euthanasia.
Admiraal PV
Issues Law Med; 1988; 3(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 3378872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. It's our right to pull the plug.
Bates RC
Med Econ; 1977 May; 54(10):162-6. PubMed ID: 11661474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A debate on the ultimate self-determination.
Baginski Y
Caring; 1992 Jun; 11(6):34-8. PubMed ID: 10145631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Socially-assisted dying and people with disabilities: some emerging legal, medical, and policy implications.
Blanck P; Kirschner K; Bienen L
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1997; 21(4):538-43. PubMed ID: 9287469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. On "Distinguishing among irrational suicide, rational suicide, and other forms of hastened death: implications for clinical practice" by Cavin P. Leeman, M.D.
Brendel R
Psychosomatics; 2009; 50(3):193-4. PubMed ID: 19567755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Resuscitation and the euthanasia debate.
Rozovsky LE
Dimens Health Serv; 1975 Nov; 52(11):8-9. PubMed ID: 11661241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The dilemma of euthanasia.
Abyad AR
J Med Liban; 1994; 42(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 7616561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Practices of anaesthesiologists with regard to withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill in Turkey.
Iyilikçi L; Erbayraktar S; Gökmen N; Ellidokuz H; Kara HC; Günerli A
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2004 Apr; 48(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 15025608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Controlled NHBD protocol for a fully conscious person: when death is intended as an end in itself and it has its own end.
Spike J
J Clin Ethics; 2000; 11(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 10904894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Consent, volition, and professional restraint: the patient who wants to die.
Lang DA
Semin Anesth; 1991 Sep; 10(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 11651355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The 'crucible of the bedside'.
Med World News; 1985 May; 26(9):112-4. PubMed ID: 11645551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Withholding and withdrawal of life support from critically ill patients.
Luce JM
West J Med; 1997 Dec; 167(6):411-6. PubMed ID: 9426480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Futility.
Hargrove MD
J La State Med Soc; 1994 Sep; 146(9):377-8. PubMed ID: 7996032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Death by default.
Lindgren J
Law Contemp Probl; 1993; 56(3):185-254. PubMed ID: 10129268
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
