These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1895853)

  • 1. Auditory performance with simultaneous intracochlear multichannel stimulation.
    Parkin JL; Randolph LJ
    Laryngoscope; 1991 Apr; 101(4 Pt 1):379-83. PubMed ID: 1895853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multichannel (Ineraid) cochlear implant update.
    Parkin JL; Randolph LJ; Parkin BD
    Laryngoscope; 1993 Aug; 103(8):835-40. PubMed ID: 8361283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multichannel cochlear implantation: Utah-design.
    Parkin JL; Stewart BE
    Laryngoscope; 1988 Mar; 98(3):262-5. PubMed ID: 3343876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of the number of active electrodes on tone and speech perception by Nucleus 22 cochlear implant users with SPEAK strategy.
    Hsu CJ; Horng MJ; Fu QJ
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():257-9. PubMed ID: 11892162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech recognition experience with multichannel cochlear implants.
    Parkin JL; Eddington DK; Orth JL; Brackmann DE
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1985 Oct; 93(5):639-45. PubMed ID: 3932933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance.
    Debruyne JA; Francart T; Janssen AM; Douma K; Brokx JP
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):174-185. PubMed ID: 27758152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Basic fitting and evaluation parameters of a newly designed cochlear implant electrode.
    Deman PR; Daemers K; Yperman M; Offeciers FE; Plasmans A; Van Dijk B; Govaerts PJ
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Apr; 124(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 15141756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Converted and upgraded maps programmed in the newer speech processor for the first generation of multichannel cochlear implant.
    Magalhães AT; Goffi-Gomez MV; Hoshino AC; Tsuji RK; Bento RF; Brito R
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1193-200. PubMed ID: 23921918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Results in patients with congenital profound hearing loss with intracochlear multichannel implants.
    Manrique MJ; Huarte A; Amor JC; Baptista P; Garcia-Tapia R
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1993; 48():222-30. PubMed ID: 8273484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of hearing preservation on electrical thresholds and speech performances in cochlear implantation.
    D'Elia A; Bartoli R; Giagnotti F; Quaranta N
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):343-7. PubMed ID: 22388729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intracochlear Electrocochleography and Speech Perception Scores in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Valenzuela CV; Lichtenhan JT; Lefler SM; Koka K; Buchman CA; Ortmann AJ
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Oct; 131(10):E2681-E2688. PubMed ID: 34019310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; Boyle PJ; De Seta E; DeVincentiis M; Mancini P
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term effects of multichannel cochlear implant usage.
    Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Shapiro WH
    Laryngoscope; 1986 Oct; 96(10):1083-7. PubMed ID: 3762284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech perception results in adults implanted with the CLARION Multi-Strategy cochlear implant.
    Osberger MJ; Fisher L; Kalberer A
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():421-4. PubMed ID: 11892207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant.
    Fraysse B; Macías AR; Sterkers O; Burdo S; Ramsden R; Deguine O; Klenzner T; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Von Wallenberg E; James C
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sound and speech recognition ability in Korean cochlear implantees, prelingually deaf children.
    Lee SH; Kim CS; Kim HN; Kim LS; Cho TH
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():343-6. PubMed ID: 11892185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of promontory and cochlear implants within a single subject.
    Edgerton BJ; House WF; Doyle KJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 91(2 Pt 3):100-3. PubMed ID: 6805388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Vienna cochlear implant program.
    Burian K; Hochmair-Desoyer IJ; Eisenwort B
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1986 May; 19(2):313-28. PubMed ID: 3754952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.