750 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18959115)
1. Biomechanical comparison of cervical transfacet pedicle screws versus pedicle screws.
Liu GY; Xu RM; Ma WH; Sun SH; Huang L; Ying JW; Jiang WY
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Aug; 121(15):1390-3. PubMed ID: 18959115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [A static mechanical comparison between two transarticular internal fixation techniques in the lower cervical spine].
Liu GY; Xu RM; Ma WH; Sun SH; Huang L; Yin JW; Jiang WY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Jun; 87(23):1599-602. PubMed ID: 17803847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical differences between transfacet and lateral mass screw-rod constructs for multilevel posterior cervical spine stabilization.
Miyanji F; Mahar A; Oka R; Newton P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):E865-9. PubMed ID: 18978579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Anatomic comparison between spinous process screws and pedicle screws techniques of the second cervical vertebar].
Liu GY; Xu RM; Ma WH; Sun SH; Lin HJ; Feng JX; Hu Y; Zhao LJ; Zhou LJ
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2011 Aug; 24(8):659-61. PubMed ID: 21928672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical transfacet versus lateral mass screws: a biomechanical comparison.
Klekamp JW; Ugbo JL; Heller JG; Hutton WC
J Spinal Disord; 2000 Dec; 13(6):515-8. PubMed ID: 11132983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical pedicle screws vs. lateral mass screws: uniplanar fatigue analysis and residual pullout strengths.
Johnston TL; Karaikovic EE; Lautenschlager EP; Marcu D
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 17088197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Radiological studies on the best entry point and trajectory of anterior cervical pedicle screw in the lower cervical spine].
Zhao LJ; Xu RM; Hua Q; Ma WH; Jiang WY; Zhu YZ
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2012 Dec; 25(12):1030-5. PubMed ID: 23627153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A biomechanical assessment of infra-laminar hooks as an alternative to supra-laminar hooks in thoracolumbar fixation.
Murakami H; Tsai KJ; Attallah-Wasif ES; Yamazaki K; Shimamura T; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):967-71. PubMed ID: 16641771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A biomechanical comparison of facet screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation: effects of short-term and long-term repetitive cycling.
Ferrara LA; Secor JL; Jin BH; Wakefield A; Inceoglu S; Benzel EC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(12):1226-34. PubMed ID: 12811265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lateral mass versus hybrid construct for cervical laminectomy and fusion.
Regan CM; Emmanuel S; Hornik C; Weinhold P; Lim MR
Orthopedics; 2013 Apr; 36(4):e484-8. PubMed ID: 23590790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical pullout strength and stability of the cervical artificial pedicle screw.
Barnes AH; Eguizabal JA; Acosta FL; Lotz JC; Buckley JM; Ames CP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(1):E16-20. PubMed ID: 19127143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine.
Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical evaluation of transfacet screw fixation for stabilization of multilevel cervical corpectomies.
Lee YP; Robertson C; Mahar A; Kuper M; Lee DS; Regev GJ; Garfin SR
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jun; 24(4):258-63. PubMed ID: 20844449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque.
Inceoglu S; Ferrara L; McLain RF
Spine J; 2004; 4(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 15363421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pullout strength of thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation: comparison of the transpedicular and extrapedicular techniques.
White KK; Oka R; Mahar AT; Lowry A; Garfin SR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(12):E355-8. PubMed ID: 16721279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanics of C-7 transfacet screw fixation.
Horn EM; Reyes PM; Baek S; Senoglu M; Theodore N; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Sep; 11(3):338-43. PubMed ID: 19769516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
