These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18959315)

  • 1. Habitat-quality effects on metapopulation dynamics in greater white-toothed shrews, Crocidura russula.
    Jaquiéry J; Guélat J; Broquet T; Berset-Brändli L; Pellegrini E; Moresi R; Hirzel AH; Perrin N
    Ecology; 2008 Oct; 89(10):2777-85. PubMed ID: 18959315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enhancing the area-isolation paradigm: habitat heterogeneity and metapopulation dynamics of a rare wetland mammal.
    Schooley RL; Branch LC
    Ecol Appl; 2009 Oct; 19(7):1708-22. PubMed ID: 19831065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mass effects mediate coexistence in competing shrews.
    Guélat J; Jaquiéry J; Berset-Brändli L; Pellegrini E; Moresi R; Broquet T; Hirzel AH; Perrin N
    Ecology; 2008 Jul; 89(7):2033-42. PubMed ID: 18705388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human-mediated dispersal and disturbance shape the metapopulation dynamics of a long-lived herb.
    Bullock JM; Wichmann MC; Hails RS; Hodgson DJ; Alexander MJ; Morley K; Knopp T; Ridding LE; Hooftman DAP
    Ecology; 2020 Aug; 101(8):e03087. PubMed ID: 32320472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metapopulation responses to patch connectivity and quality are masked by successional habitat dynamics.
    Hodgson JA; Moilanen A; Thomas CD
    Ecology; 2009 Jun; 90(6):1608-19. PubMed ID: 19569375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relative importance of local and regional processes to metapopulation dynamics.
    Dallas TA; Saastamoinen M; Schulz T; Ovaskainen O
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 Mar; 89(3):884-896. PubMed ID: 31705670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metapopulation dynamics on ephemeral patches.
    Reigada C; Schreiber SJ; Altermatt F; Holyoak M
    Am Nat; 2015 Feb; 185(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 25616138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Metapopulation persistence in fragmented landscapes: significant interactions between genetic and demographic processes.
    Theodorou K; Souan H; Couvet D
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Jan; 22(1):152-62. PubMed ID: 19120816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial structure and dispersal dynamics in a house sparrow metapopulation.
    Ranke PS; Araya-Ajoy YG; Ringsby TH; Pärn H; Rønning B; Jensen H; Wright J; Saether BE
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 Dec; 90(12):2767-2781. PubMed ID: 34455579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Population dynamics of small endotherms under global change: Greater white-toothed shrews Crocidura russula in Mediterranean habitats.
    Torre I; Bastardas-Llabot J; Arrizabalaga A; Díaz M
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 705():135799. PubMed ID: 31810679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variability in primary productivity determines metapopulation dynamics.
    Fernández N; Román J; Delibes M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Apr; 283(1828):. PubMed ID: 27053739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How Do Landscape Structure, Management and Habitat Quality Drive the Colonization of Habitat Patches by the Dryad Butterfly (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae) in Fragmented Grassland?
    Kalarus K; Nowicki P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138557. PubMed ID: 26375036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disentangling the role of seed bank and dispersal in plant metapopulation dynamics using patch occupancy surveys.
    Manna F; Pradel R; Choquet R; Fréville H; Cheptou PO
    Ecology; 2017 Oct; 98(10):2662-2672. PubMed ID: 28734092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatially structured metapopulation models: global and local assessment of metapopulation capacity.
    Ovaskainen O; Hanski I
    Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Dec; 60(4):281-302. PubMed ID: 11878830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatially explicit modeling of metapopulation dynamics of broadcast spawners and stabilizing/destabilizing effects of heterogeneity of quality across local habitats.
    Bessho K; Yashima K; Horii T; Hori M
    J Theor Biol; 2020 May; 492():110157. PubMed ID: 31953136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Which spatial heterogeneity framework? Consequences for conclusions about patchy population distributions.
    Talley TS
    Ecology; 2007 Jun; 88(6):1476-89. PubMed ID: 17601140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does colonization asymmetry matter in metapopulations?
    Vuilleumier S; Possingham HP
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Jul; 273(1594):1637-42. PubMed ID: 16769635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increasing connectivity between metapopulation ecology and landscape ecology.
    Howell PE; Muths E; Hossack BR; Sigafus BH; Chandler RB
    Ecology; 2018 May; 99(5):1119-1128. PubMed ID: 29453767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patch definition in metapopulation analysis: a graph theory approach to solve the mega-patch problem.
    Cavanaugh KC; Siegel DA; Raimondi PT; Alberto F
    Ecology; 2014 Feb; 95(2):316-28. PubMed ID: 24669726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of patch quality and network structure on patch occupancy dynamics of a yellow-bellied marmot metapopulation.
    Ozgul A; Armitage KB; Blumstein DT; Vanvuren DH; Oli MK
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 Jan; 75(1):191-202. PubMed ID: 16903056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.