451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18959486)
1. PLoS Biology at 5: the future is open access.
Bloom T; Ferguson C; Gross L; Maccallum CJ; Milton J; Shields R; Wai S; Weaver J; Williams L
PLoS Biol; 2008 Oct; 6(10):e267. PubMed ID: 18959486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. PLoS biology--we're open.
Bernstein P; Cohen B; MacCallum C; Parthasarathy H; Patterson M; Siegel V
PLoS Biol; 2003 Oct; 1(1):E34. PubMed ID: 14551925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PLoS Biology in action.
Cohen B
PLoS Biol; 2004 Jan; 2(1):E25. PubMed ID: 14737199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PLOS position on NIH public access policy.
Gass A; Doyle H
Science; 2005 Apr; 308(5720):356. PubMed ID: 15831740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. PLoS stays afloat with bulk publishing.
Butler D
Nature; 2008 Jul; 454(7200):11. PubMed ID: 18596768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The crisis in scholarly publishing: open access to the rescue?
Oren GA
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18347450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Looking ahead to the next 75 years for the Journal of Pediatrics and medical publishing.
Campbell G; Poppalardo P
J Pediatr; 2009 Jul; 155(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 19559287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Open access.
McDonald JC
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(2):83. PubMed ID: 17110385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Why PLoS became a publisher.
Brown PO; Eisen MB; Varmus HE
PLoS Biol; 2003 Oct; 1(1):E36. PubMed ID: 14551926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. President's editorial--Some thoughts on the future of scientific publishing.
Singer RL
J Forensic Sci; 2004 Sep; 49(5):899-900. PubMed ID: 15461086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The nine flavours of open access scholarly publishing.
Willinsky J
J Postgrad Med; 2003; 49(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 14597793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Electronic publishing in radiology: economics and the future.
Chew FS; Llewellyn KT; Olsen KM
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Nov; 1(11):815-23. PubMed ID: 17411712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Practice corner: the science and art of measuring the impact of an article.
Maximin S; Green D
Radiographics; 2014; 34(1):116-8. PubMed ID: 24428285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Publishers hire PR heavyweight to defend themselves against open access.
Dyer O
BMJ; 2007 Feb; 334(7587):227. PubMed ID: 17272546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The open access advantage.
Eysenbach G
J Med Internet Res; 2006 May; 8(2):e8. PubMed ID: 16867971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The status of open access publishing by academic societies.
Byrd GD; Bader SA; Mazzaschi AJ
J Med Libr Assoc; 2005 Oct; 93(4):423-4. PubMed ID: 16239934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Introducing Open Highlights: Highlighting Open Access Research from PLOS and Beyond.
PLOS Biology Editors
PLoS Biol; 2016 Jul; 14(7):e1002514. PubMed ID: 27400228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Whose copy? Whose rights?
Gass A; Doyle H; Kennison R
PLoS Biol; 2004 Jul; 2(7):E228. PubMed ID: 15252465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PR's 'pit bull' takes on open access.
Giles J
Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7126):347. PubMed ID: 17251943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The PLoS community journals.
Patterson M; MacCallum C; Parthasarathy H; Sedwick C
PLoS Biol; 2005 Apr; 3(4):e129. PubMed ID: 15819606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
