BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18959630)

  • 1. Improving cancer control and recovery of potency after radical prostatectomy: nerve sparing versus nerve resection with grafting.
    Cozzi P
    ANZ J Surg; 2008 Oct; 78(10):834-5. PubMed ID: 18959630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nerve grafting at the time of radical prostatectomy: should we be doing it?
    Mancuso P; Rashid P
    ANZ J Surg; 2008 Oct; 78(10):859-63. PubMed ID: 18959637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of nerve sparing technique on patient self-assessed outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy.
    Kübler HR; Tseng TY; Sun L; Vieweg J; Harris MJ; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):488-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17561133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of statin therapy on early return of potency after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Hong SK; Han BK; Jeong SJ; Byun SS; Lee SE
    J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):613-6. PubMed ID: 17570410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Editorial comment on: Randomized phase II trial evaluation of erectile function after attempted unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing retropubic radical prostatectomy with versus without unilateral sural nerve grafting for clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Gontero P
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1144. PubMed ID: 18783874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nerve-sparing techniques in open and laparoscopic prostatectomy.
    Rodriguez E; Melamud O; Ahlering TE
    Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2008 Mar; 8(3):475-9. PubMed ID: 18366294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Cavernous nerve reconstruction to restore erectile function following radical prostatectomy].
    Song LJ; Pan LJ; Xu YM
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2006 Oct; 12(10):939-42. PubMed ID: 17121030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of unilateral sural nerve graft on recovery of potency and continence following radical prostatectomy: 3-year longitudinal study.
    Namiki S; Saito S; Nakagawa H; Sanada T; Yamada A; Arai Y
    J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):212-6; discussion 216. PubMed ID: 17499797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Nerve-sparing open radical prostatectomy with extracapsular dissection].
    Barré C; Thoulouzan M
    Prog Urol; 2009 Dec; 19 Suppl 4():S177-9. PubMed ID: 20123515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neurostimulation during radical prostatectomy: improving nerve-sparing techniques.
    Klotz L
    Semin Urol Oncol; 2000 Feb; 18(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 10719931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Health-related quality of life evaluation in patients undergoing cavernous nerve reconstruction during radical prostatectomy.
    Sugimoto M; Tsunemori H; Kakehi Y
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2009 Oct; 39(10):671-6. PubMed ID: 19654133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Strategies to promote recovery of cavernous nerve function after radical prostatectomy.
    Burnett AL
    World J Urol; 2003 May; 20(6):337-42. PubMed ID: 12811492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy: techniques and clinical considerations.
    Gontero P; Kirby RS
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2005; 8(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 15711608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Editorial comment on: Randomized phase II trial evaluation of erectile function after attempted unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing retropubic radical prostatectomy with versus without unilateral sural nerve grafting for clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Eden CG
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1143. PubMed ID: 18783871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prostate cancer surgery: is nerve-sparing safe?
    Harv Mens Health Watch; 2005 Feb; 9(7):4-7. PubMed ID: 15799105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors affecting erectile function after radical retropubic prostatectomy: results from 1620 consecutive patients.
    Ayyathurai R; Manoharan M; Nieder AM; Kava B; Soloway MS
    BJU Int; 2008 Apr; 101(7):833-6. PubMed ID: 18190627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The failure of a nerve sparing template to improve urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: attention to study design.
    Tzou DT; Dalkin BL; Christopher BA; Cui H
    Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 18439849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does a nerve-sparing technique or potency affect continence after open radical retropubic prostatectomy?
    Marien TP; Lepor H
    BJU Int; 2008 Dec; 102(11):1581-4. PubMed ID: 18808410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preserving potency after prostate cancer surgery.
    Harv Mens Health Watch; 2002 Sep; 7(2):7-8. PubMed ID: 12356553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Preservation of erectile function and radical prostatectomy: what to expect in 2005?].
    Kanso C; Amar E; Bondil P; Boccon-Gibod L; Delmas V
    Prog Urol; 2005 Sep; 15(4):621-5. PubMed ID: 16459674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.