170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18959712)
1. Rapid versus full systematic reviews: validity in clinical practice?
Watt A; Cameron A; Sturm L; Lathlean T; Babidge W; Blamey S; Facey K; Hailey D; Norderhaug I; Maddern G
ANZ J Surg; 2008 Nov; 78(11):1037-40. PubMed ID: 18959712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: an inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment.
Watt A; Cameron A; Sturm L; Lathlean T; Babidge W; Blamey S; Facey K; Hailey D; Norderhaug I; Maddern G
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 18400114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What is a rapid review? A methodological exploration of rapid reviews in Health Technology Assessments.
Harker J; Kleijnen J
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2012 Dec; 10(4):397-410. PubMed ID: 23173665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Historical development of health technology assessment in Thailand.
Teerawattananon Y; Tantivess S; Yothasamut J; Kingkaew P; Chaisiri K
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():241-52. PubMed ID: 19527543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surrogate outcomes in health technology assessment: an international comparison.
Velasco Garrido M; Mangiapane S
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 19619350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic reviews of low back pain prognosis had variable methods and results: guidance for future prognosis reviews.
Hayden JA; Chou R; Hogg-Johnson S; Bombardier C
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):781-796.e1. PubMed ID: 19136234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An introduction to an evidence-based approach to interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain.
Manchikanti L; Singh V; Helm S; Schultz DM; Datta S; Hirsch JA;
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(4):E1-33. PubMed ID: 19668280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Systematic reviews of health care interventions: an essential component of health sciences graduate programs.
Peacock S; Forbes D
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh; 2004; 1():Article15. PubMed ID: 16646880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A determination of topics for health technology assessment in Thailand: making decision makers involved.
Lertpitakpong C; Chaikledkaew U; Thavorncharoensap M; Tantivess S; Praditsitthikorn N; Youngkong S; Yothasamut J; Udomsuk K; Sinthitichai K; Teerawattananon Y
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jun; 91 Suppl 2():S100-9. PubMed ID: 19253492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Health technology assessment agencies: an international overview of organizational aspects.
Martelli F; La Torre G; Di Ghionno E; Staniscia T; Neroni M; Cicchetti A; Von Bremen K; Ricciardi W;
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2007; 23(4):414-24. PubMed ID: 17937828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Treatment of dementia and cognitive impairment: what can we learn from the Cochrane Library.
Bereczki D; Szatmári S
J Neurol Sci; 2009 Aug; 283(1-2):207-10. PubMed ID: 19268303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Prioritisation of topics for systematic reviews in hand surgery. Results of an expert survey].
Schädel-Höpfner M; Diener MK; Eisenschenk A; Lögters T; Windolf J
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2011 Feb; 43(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 21161876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. EJPRM systematic continuous update on Cochrane reviews in rehabilitation: news from the 4th Issue 2008.
Zaina F
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2009 Mar; 45(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 19293757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methodological approaches in conducting overviews: current state in HTA agencies.
Pieper D; Antoine SL; Morfeld JC; Mathes T; Eikermann M
Res Synth Methods; 2014 Sep; 5(3):187-99. PubMed ID: 26052845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of the quality of mini-HTA.
Kidholm K; Ehlers L; Korsbek L; Kjaerby R; Beck M
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jan; 25(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 19126250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Health technology assessment development in China.
Chen Y; Banta D; Tang Z
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():202-9. PubMed ID: 19575825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A preliminary survey on the influence of rapid health technology assessments.
Hailey D
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25(3):415-8. PubMed ID: 19619362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
