These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18959712)

  • 21. History of health technology assessment in Belgium.
    Cleemput I; Van Wilder P
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():82-7. PubMed ID: 19500438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fit for purpose: perspectives on rapid reviews from end-user interviews.
    Hartling L; Guise JM; Hempel S; Featherstone R; Mitchell MD; Motu'apuaka ML; Robinson KA; Schoelles K; Totten A; Whitlock E; Wilt TJ; Anderson J; Berliner E; Gozu A; Kato E; Paynter R; Umscheid CA
    Syst Rev; 2017 Feb; 6(1):32. PubMed ID: 28212677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Critical appraise of systematic reviews in vascular surgery. A practical example].
    Vaz Carneiro A
    Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc; 2008; 15(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 19116683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Making research relevant: if it is an evidence-based practice, where's the practice-based evidence?
    Green LW
    Fam Pract; 2008 Dec; 25 Suppl 1():i20-4. PubMed ID: 18794201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluating new surgical techniques in Australia: the Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures-Surgical experience.
    Maddern GJ; Middleton PF; Tooher R; Babidge WJ
    Surg Clin North Am; 2006 Feb; 86(1):115-28, ix-x. PubMed ID: 16442424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Role of health technology assessment in shaping the benefits package in The Netherlands.
    Stolk EA; de Bont A; van Halteren AR; Bijlmer RJ; Poley MJ
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2009 Feb; 9(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 19371181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ensuring inclusion of research reports in systematic reviews.
    Dijkers MP
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Nov; 90(11 Suppl):S60-9. PubMed ID: 19892076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Can decision making in general surgery be based on evidence? An empirical study of Cochrane Reviews.
    Diener MK; Wolff RF; von Elm E; Rahbari NN; Mavergames C; Knaebel HP; Seiler CM; Antes G
    Surgery; 2009 Sep; 146(3):444-61. PubMed ID: 19715801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Health technology assessment in Malaysia.
    Sivalal S
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():224-30. PubMed ID: 19527541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The development of health technology assessment in Brazil.
    Banta D; Almeida RT
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():255-9. PubMed ID: 19538816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Development and implementation of health technology assessment in Argentina: two steps forward and one step back.
    Rubinstein A; Pichon-Riviere A; Augustovski F
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():260-9. PubMed ID: 19527545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. What medical specialists like and dislike about health technology assessment reports.
    Lehoux P; Hivon M; Denis JL; Tailliez S
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2009 Oct; 14(4):197-203. PubMed ID: 19770117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Nursing sensitive quality indicators for nursing home care: international review of literature, policy and practice.
    Nakrem S; Vinsnes AG; Harkless GE; Paulsen B; Seim A
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Jun; 46(6):848-57. PubMed ID: 19117567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort.
    van Driel ML; De Sutter A; De Maeseneer J; Christiaens T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):838-844.e3. PubMed ID: 19128939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. History of health technology assessment: Spain.
    Sampietro-Colom L; Asua J; Briones E; Gol J;
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():163-73. PubMed ID: 19538814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Alberta Hip and Knee Replacement Project: a model for health technology assessment based on comparative effectiveness of clinical pathways.
    Gooch KL; Smith D; Wasylak T; Faris PD; Marshall DA; Khong H; Hibbert JE; Parker RD; Zernicke RF; Beaupre L; Pearce T; Johnston DW; Frank CB
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Apr; 25(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 19366494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The history of health technology assessment in Australia.
    Hailey D
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():61-7. PubMed ID: 19500436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Health technology assessment in South Korea.
    Kim CY
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():219-23. PubMed ID: 19527540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The research evidence published in high impact nursing journals between 2000 and 2006: a quantitative content analysis.
    Mantzoukas S
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Apr; 46(4):479-89. PubMed ID: 19187934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Health technology assessment in Finland.
    Mäkelä M; Roine RP
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():102-7. PubMed ID: 19500439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.