These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1896441)

  • 1. From contacts and bondings between bone and bioactive glass to bonding of bioactive glass and porcelain to metal alloys, different methods of fracture repair.
    Uusalo E; Yli-Urpo A
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1991; 87(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 1896441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repair strength of etched vs silica-coated metal-ceramic and all-ceramic restorations.
    Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Sindel J
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 11203818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials.
    Kim BK; Bae HE; Shim JS; Lee KW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 16198173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of in vitro tensile bond strengths of luting cements to metallic and tooth-colored posts.
    Sahmali S; Demirel F; Saygili G
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Jun; 24(3):256-63. PubMed ID: 15227773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shear bond strengths of 2 intraoral porcelain repair systems to porcelain or metal substrates.
    Haselton DR; Diaz-Arnold AM; Dunne JT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):526-31. PubMed ID: 11725281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations.
    Aboushelib MN; de Jager N; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
    Dent Mater; 2005 Oct; 21(10):984-91. PubMed ID: 16085302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: Part 1. Comparison of shear bond strengths between different metal-resin bonding systems and a metal-ceramic system.
    Petridis H; Garefis P; Hirayama H; Kafantaris NM; Koidis PT
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):635-9. PubMed ID: 14714844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bonding orthodontic brackets to porcelain using different adhesives/enamel conditioners: a comparative study.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Oonsombat C; Laffoon J
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15794038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Biomechanic and histomorphometric studies of HIP titanium glass ceramic, a new implant material, compared with glass ceramics, titanium and titanium alloy].
    Schmitz HJ; Fritz TR; Fuhrmann G; Gross U; Strunz V
    Dtsch Z Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1990; 14(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 2102405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of adhesives with various degrees of hydrophilicity on resin ceramic bond durability.
    El Zohairy AA; De Gee AJ; Hassan FM; Feilzer AJ
    Dent Mater; 2004 Oct; 20(8):778-87. PubMed ID: 15302458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fusion of low-fusing porcelain to Ti-75 alloy: an experimental study.
    He H; Xu L; Wen N; Wang Z; Zheng X
    Chin J Dent Res; 2000 May; 3(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 11314338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of interface characterization and adhesion of glass ceramics to commercially pure titanium and gold alloy after thermal- and mechanical-loading.
    Vásquez VZ; Ozcan M; Kimpara ET
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 18718654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adhesive bond of veneering composites on various metal surfaces using silicoating, titanium-coating or functional monomers.
    Behr M; Rosentritt M; Gröger G; Handel G
    J Dent; 2003 Jan; 31(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 12615018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of bond strength of a pressed ceramic fused to metal versus feldspathic porcelain fused to metal.
    Schweitzer DM; Goldstein GR; Ricci JL; Silva NR; Hittelman EL
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Dec; 14(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 16359480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of different etching times of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel on the shear bond strength of high-leucite ceramics bonded to composite resin.
    Kukiattrakoon B; Thammasitboon K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jul; 98(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 17631170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of composite resin-to-porcelain bond strength with three adhesives.
    Kelsey WP; Latta MA; Stanislav CM; Shaddy RS
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(4):418-21. PubMed ID: 11199616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bond strengths of porcelain repair adhesive systems.
    Diaz-Arnold AM; Wistrom DW; Aquilino SA; Swift EJ
    Am J Dent; 1993 Dec; 6(6):291-4. PubMed ID: 7880478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of adhesives on bond strength of porcelain veneer to base metal alloy.
    Goharian R; Maleknejad F; Salari T; Ghavamnasiri M; Derhami M
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Sep; 33(8):595-9. PubMed ID: 12238691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic: the effect of surface conditioning.
    Amaral R; Ozcan M; Bottino MA; Valandro LF
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 16039705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic.
    Chaiyabutr Y; McGowan S; Phillips KM; Kois JC; Giordano RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):194-202. PubMed ID: 18762031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.