These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1896586)
1. [Radiologic study of the thorax using the digital method (FCR 101). Evaluation of various parameters as related to exposure]. Perri G; Battolla L; Palla L; D'Alessandro F; Torri T; Tagliagambe A Radiol Med; 1991; 82(1-2):84-8. PubMed ID: 1896586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Digital radiography of the thorax with selenium detector. Clinical results and optimization potential of the technique]. Procacci C; Minniti S; Caumo F; Moore F; Ternullo S; Predicatori F; Locatelli F; Pistolesi GF Radiol Med; 1998 Nov; 96(5):446-53. PubMed ID: 10051867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dose-image quality study in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo simulation. Correa SC; Souza EM; Silva AX; Lopes RT; Yoriyaz H Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Sep; 66(9):1213-7. PubMed ID: 18308576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose. Kim MJ; Park CH; Choi SJ; Hwang KH; Kim HS J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 19478637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [A comparison between traditional mammography and digital with storage phosphors]. Lambruschi G; Tagliagambe A; Palla L; Torri T; D'Alessandro F; Pastori R; Barbieri L Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):59-64. PubMed ID: 8480050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital radiography of the chest by self-scanning linear diode arrays. Slasky BS; Sashin D; Horton JA; Sternglass EJ; Bron KM; Deutsch M; Herron JM; Kennedy WH; Boyer JW; Girdany BR Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(4):461-6. PubMed ID: 2958064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital chest radiography system with amorphous selenium flat-panel detectors: Qualitative and dosimetric comparison with a dedicated film-screen system. Prato A; Ropolo R; Fava C Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):561-73. PubMed ID: 16437042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visibility of normal thoracic anatomic landmarks on storage phosphor digital radiography versus conventional radiography. Konen E; Greenberg I; Rozenman J Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Aug; 7(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 16106773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Digital hilar tomography. A comparison with the conventional technique]. Schäfer CB; Braunschweig R; Teufl F; Kaiser W; Claussen CD Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 May; 3(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 8518305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 4: Entrance doses achieved during the X-ray examination of the chest]. Seidenbusch MC; Schneider K Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1082-103. PubMed ID: 19009497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Reduction of patient exposure by the use of digital luminescence radiography]. Seifert H; Chapot C J Radiol; 1999 Nov; 80(11):1555-60. PubMed ID: 10592912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Initial clinical results with a new needle screen storage phosphor system in chest radiograms. Körner M; Wirth S; Treitl M; Reiser M; Pfeifer KJ Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1491-6. PubMed ID: 16302129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advanced multiple beam equalization radiography (AMBER) combined with computed radiography. Preliminary evaluation. de Rooy TP; Oestmann JW; Schultze Kool LJ; Vrooman H; Buchmann F Acta Radiol; 1993 Sep; 34(5):445-9. PubMed ID: 8369179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of technical and anatomical noise in digital thorax X-ray images. Hoeschen C; Tischenko O; Buhr E; Illers H Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):75-80. PubMed ID: 15933084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiation dose in digital chest radiography: comparison among three technologies. Saiani F; Ghirardi C; Rodella CA; Feroldi P; Chiesa A Radiol Med; 2004 Apr; 107(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 15103291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization]. Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Reissberg S; Scherlach C; Döhring W Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Method of simulating dose reduction for digital radiographic systems. Båth M; Håkansson M; Tingberg A; Månsson LG Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):253-9. PubMed ID: 15933117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging. De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]