These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology. Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques]. Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Drescher P; Loose R; Georgi M Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dose reduction in digital chest radiography and perceived image quality. Kroft LJ; Veldkamp WJ; Mertens BJ; van Delft JP; Geleijns J Br J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 80(960):984-8. PubMed ID: 17940130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Effect of digital radiography processing parameters on digital chest radiograph for occupational exposed workers]. Wang XH; Liu DS; Xuan X; Kang H; Yuan HS Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2013 May; 31(5):351-5. PubMed ID: 23803524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Double-contrast enema. Study of the mucosal pattern and the organ profile with conventional and digital methods]. Perri G; Palla L; Battolla L; Tagliagambe A; D'Alessandro F; Torri T; Benocci G; Lambruschi G; Napoli V; Barbieri L Radiol Med; 1991 Jun; 81(6):844-8. PubMed ID: 1857793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Digital radiography in chest imaging. Pirronti T; Meduri A; Natale L; Sallustio G Rays; 1992; 17(4):469-81. PubMed ID: 1289967 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Conventional radiography and digital radiography of the thorax: evaluation of anatomo-radiological parameters]. Del Maschio A; Vanzulli A; Panizza P; Del Maschio M; Rodighiero M; Cucchi E; Zanello A; Sironi S Radiol Med; 1989 Jun; 77(6):621-5. PubMed ID: 2756178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reduced radiation dose and improved image quality using a mini mobile digital imaging system in a neonatal intensive care unit. Kim TH; Ryu JH; Jeong CW; Jun HY; Heo DW; Lee SH; Oh YK; Lee MJ; Yoon KH Clin Imaging; 2017; 42():165-171. PubMed ID: 28064140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comprehensive physical image quality evaluation of a selenium based digital x-ray imaging system for thorax radiography. Launders JH; Kengyelics SM; Cowen AR Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):986-97. PubMed ID: 9650189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Supine thoracic images with a mobile roentgen unit: comparison between the soft-ray and hard-ray technics]. Prager P; Neumann D; Geiger K; Jaschke W; Diezler P; Brundin K Rontgenblatter; 1984 Dec; 37(12):409-13. PubMed ID: 6523005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Digital radiography of the chest. Evaluation of normal anatomical structure and low dose radiography]. Sakurai K; Hachiya J; Korenaga T; Nitatori T; Miyasaka Y; Furuya Y Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Jan; 44(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 6739279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Investigation of an Optimum Determination Method of Exposure Index for Posterior-Anterior Chest Radiographs Using an Auto Exposure Control]. Yanagita S; Imahana M; Gomi T; Nishiki M Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Mar; 72(3):234-43. PubMed ID: 27000672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Digital radiography: a commentary. MacMahon H J Thorac Imaging; 2010 Feb; 25(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 20160598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Compression of digital chest radiographs with a mixture of principal components neural network: evaluation of performance. Dony RD; Coblentz CL; Nabmias C; Haykin S Radiographics; 1996 Nov; 16(6):1481-8. PubMed ID: 8946548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Radiologic examination of the thorax]. Leroux GF; Malchair F Bull Mem Acad R Med Belg; 1979 Oct; 134(9):485-94. PubMed ID: 553690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Evaluation study of abnormal detectability with Thurstone and Scheffé (Nakaya) of paired comparison method using chest phantom]. Mochizuki Y Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Jan; 70(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 24464066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Influence of interest region and interest value settings on exposure index-analysis using chest clinical images]. Nakamae M; Miyajima Y; Nakano T; Kitanaka Y; Okura Y Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Nov; 70(11):1250-7. PubMed ID: 25410331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Digital radiography of the chest: reassessment of the high-voltage technique? Venema HW; van Straten M; den Heeten GJ Radiology; 2005 Apr; 235(1):336-7; author reply 337-8. PubMed ID: 15798175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Traditional and digital urography compared. The authors' own experience]. Cervi PM; Bighi S; Merlo L; Lupi L; Vita G Radiol Med; 1990 Apr; 79(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 2377752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]