These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

49 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1897055)

  • 1. [Mammography screening].
    Blichert-Toft M
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1991 Aug; 153(34):2367. PubMed ID: 1897055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of systematic and non-systematic ('opportunistic') screening mammography: a comparative study from Denmark.
    Bihrmann K; Jensen A; Olsen AH; Njor S; Schwartz W; Vejborg I; Lynge E
    J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 18416951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Promising results from mammography screening].
    Thurfjell E
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Mar; 92(12):1197-8. PubMed ID: 7707753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancing early breast cancer screening: an expanded role for mammography facilities is needed.
    Gregorio DI; Kegeles S; Parker C; Benn S
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1991; 15(2):151-3. PubMed ID: 2032257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Screening with mammography--a critical attitude is supported by new findings].
    Andersson I; Janzon L
    Lakartidningen; 1988 Nov; 85(44):3666-9. PubMed ID: 3059110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [We should insist on mammographic mass screening. Its value for age groups 50-69 is indisputable].
    Larsson LG; Nyström L
    Lakartidningen; 1996 Apr; 93(14):1338-42. PubMed ID: 8656867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Mammography screening].
    Petersson B
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1991 Jul; 153(29):2074-5. PubMed ID: 1858195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of individual breast cancer screening in the Alpes-Maritimes].
    Fontas P; Bregeault A; Maestro C; Namer M; Obadia Y; Rotily M
    J Radiol; 1996 Sep; 77(9):657-62. PubMed ID: 8944122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting the risk of a false-positive test for women following a mammography screening programme.
    Njor SH; Olsen AH; Schwartz W; Vejborg I; Lynge E
    J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 17626709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Make an independent assessment of mammographic screening!].
    Einhorn J
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Mar; 97(12):1366-7. PubMed ID: 10765617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Assessment of the effect of mammographic screening can not be based on wrong data].
    Tabár L
    Lakartidningen; 1999 Apr; 96(14):1763-4. PubMed ID: 10222696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Mammographic screening in the municipality of Copenhagen].
    Dige U
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Apr; 164(16):2177-8. PubMed ID: 11989065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Mammography screening. Breast cancer mortality reduction by one fourth].
    Kreutzkamp B
    Med Monatsschr Pharm; 2005 Sep; 28(9):330-1. PubMed ID: 16163889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Mammography screening].
    Hansen OP
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1991 Nov; 153(45):3157-8. PubMed ID: 1957366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overdiagnosis, sojourn time, and sensitivity in the Copenhagen mammography screening program.
    Olsen AH; Agbaje OF; Myles JP; Lynge E; Duffy SW
    Breast J; 2006; 12(4):338-42. PubMed ID: 16848843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mass screening for breast cancer: is it worthwhile?
    Vogel VG
    Tex Med; 1988 May; 84(5):36-9. PubMed ID: 3406897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Treatment of primary breast cancer. Consequences of mammographic screening in the municipality of Copenhagen].
    Hirsch FR; Mouridsen HT; Hansen OP; Jørgensen T; Blichert-Toft M; Rank FE; Jensen MB
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Feb; 158(9):1218-21. PubMed ID: 8644426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Mammographic examinations in Denmark in 1984].
    Pociot F; Storm HH; Lynge E
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1986 Feb; 148(8):471-4. PubMed ID: 3961991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The results of mammography must be interpreted correctly even in a debate].
    Tabár L
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Aug; 92(34):2980. PubMed ID: 7650980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.