These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18972164)

  • 1. Letter to the editor re: "The radiology digital dashboard: effects on report turnaround time.".
    Branstetter BF; Morgan MB
    J Digit Imaging; 2009 Apr; 22(2):103. PubMed ID: 18972164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The radiology digital dashboard: effects on report turnaround time.
    Morgan MB; Branstetter BF; Lionetti DM; Richardson JS; Chang PJ
    J Digit Imaging; 2008 Mar; 21(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 17334871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can health IT tools enable improved documentation of quality, safety measures, and regulatory requirements in radiology reports?
    Khorasani R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 May; 10(5):381-2. PubMed ID: 23642880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancing structured reporting: improving quality by tailoring the report to the clinical scenario.
    Samartine S; White L; McKeon D; Becker M
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Aug; 12(8):845-7. PubMed ID: 26250977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Expediting the turnaround of radiology reports: use of total quality management to facilitate radiologists' report signing.
    Seltzer SE; Kelly P; Adams DF; Chiango BF; Viera MA; Fener E; Rondeau R; Kazanjian N; Laffel G; Shaffer K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):775-81. PubMed ID: 8140990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Voice recognition software: effect on radiology report turnaround time at an academic medical center.
    Krishnaraj A; Lee JK; Laws SA; Crawford TJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jul; 195(1):194-7. PubMed ID: 20566816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Re: "Improving the quality of radiology reporting: a physician survey to define the target" (J Am Coll Radiol 2004;1:497-505).
    Stolberg HO
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Sep; 1(9):700-1. PubMed ID: 17411684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of PACS deployment strategy on dictation turnaround time of chest radiographs.
    Lepanto L; Paré G; Gauvin A
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 16554224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Applications of the digital network in radiotherapy].
    Jiang RY; Li B
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2006 May; 30(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 16929784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Just in Time Radiology Decision Support Using Real-time Data Feeds.
    Burns JL; Hasting D; Gichoya JW; McKibben B; Shea L; Frank M
    J Digit Imaging; 2020 Feb; 33(1):137-142. PubMed ID: 31515754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Digital documentation of image and findings].
    Hesse A; Nuber B
    Bildgebung; 1992 Sep; 59(3):159. PubMed ID: 1422002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Conservation of documents and medical and hospital archives].
    Rev Infirm; 2005 Apr; (110):41-2. PubMed ID: 15913001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integrating multiple clinical information systems using the Java Message Service framework.
    Tellis WM; Andriole KP
    J Digit Imaging; 2004 Jun; 17(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 15037940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving medical imaging report turnaround times.
    Marquez LO
    Radiol Manage; 2005; 27(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 15794377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiology information systems: evaluation and selection issues.
    David G
    Radiol Technol; 1998; 69(5):406-10. PubMed ID: 9606703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automating a radiology practice.
    Pretto J
    Adm Radiol; 1992 Sep; 11(9):59-60. PubMed ID: 10121768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Use of computers in radiology. Word processing, office technology and documentation--continuing the past or using newer technology?].
    Küsters H
    Rofo; 1987 Jun; 146(6):716-22. PubMed ID: 3037646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Data interface between a radiology information system and a computed radiography system using a personal computer and standard software.
    Piqueras J; Carreño JC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Dec; 161(6):1313-5. PubMed ID: 8249750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Re: "Frequency and spectrum of errors in final radiology reports generated with automatic speech recognition technology".
    Marcovici PA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Apr; 6(4):282-3; author reply 283. PubMed ID: 19327665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Re: "frequency and spectrum of errors in final radiology reports generated with automatic speech recognition technology".
    Branstetter BF; Shrestha RB
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Jul; 6(7):535-6; reply 536-7. PubMed ID: 19560076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.