BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18973131)

  • 21. A large-scale investigator-sponsored field study of the test performance of the ThinPrep papanicolaou test in a low-risk routine outpatient setting.
    Weintraub J; Wenger D
    Prim Care Update Ob Gyns; 1998 Jul; 5(4):164. PubMed ID: 10838306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy of a low priced liquid-based method for cervical cytology in 632 women referred for colposcopy after a positive Pap smear.
    van Hemel BM; Buikema HJ; Groen H; Suurmeijer AJ
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Aug; 37(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 19373881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS): Interobserver reproducibility in cervical smears and corresponding thin-layer preparations.
    Lee KR; Darragh TM; Joste NE; Krane JF; Sherman ME; Hurley LB; Allred EM; Manos MM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Jan; 117(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 11789738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Value of normal colposcopy after an abnormal cervical smear report.
    Luesley D; Downey G
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 19098604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative study: conventional cervical and ThinPrep Pap tests in a routine clinical setting.
    Grace A; McBrearty P; Troost S; Thornhill M; Kay E; Leader M
    Cytopathology; 2002 Aug; 13(4):200-5. PubMed ID: 12269892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of liquid-based cytology in cervical screening of high-risk populations: a split study of colposcopy and genito-urinary medicine populations.
    Ring M; Bolger N; O'Donnell M; Malkin A; Bermingham N; Akpan E; Mulcahy F; Turner MJ; Griffin M; O'Leary JJ
    Cytopathology; 2002 Jun; 13(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 12060077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and a fluid-based, thin-layer system for cervical cancer screening.
    Lee KR; Ashfaq R; Birdsong GG; Corkill ME; McIntosh KM; Inhorn SL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 90(2):278-84. PubMed ID: 9241308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Salivary gland fine needle aspiration using the ThinPrep technique: diagnostic accuracy, cytologic artifacts and pitfalls.
    Al-Khafaji BM; Afify AM
    Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(4):567-74. PubMed ID: 11480720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Colposcopic examination of patients with class II Papanicolaou smears.
    Shaw CT
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1986 Jun; 86(6):355-9. PubMed ID: 3733482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Two cytological methods for screening for cervical cancer].
    Kirschner B; Simonsen K; Junge J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 May; 170(22):1933-7. PubMed ID: 18513478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Usefulness of liquid-based preparation in urine cytology.
    Hwang EC; Park SH; Jung SI; Kwon DD; Park K; Ryu SB; Park CS
    Int J Urol; 2007 Jul; 14(7):626-9. PubMed ID: 17645607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prevalence and management of abnormal pap smear in antenatal care clinic at Thammasat University Hospital.
    Sueblinvong T; Suwannarurk K; Chanthasenanont A; Treetampinich C; Pongrojpaw D
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Feb; 88(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 15962660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for clinical management of abnormal cervical cytology, part 1.
    Jordan J; Arbyn M; Martin-Hirsch P; Schenck U; Baldauf JJ; Da Silva D; Anttila A; Nieminen P; Prendiville W
    Cytopathology; 2008 Dec; 19(6):342-54. PubMed ID: 19040546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multicenter direct to vial evaluation of a liquid-based pap test.
    Hatch KD; Sheets E; Kennedy A; Ferris DG; Darragh T; Twiggs L
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2004 Oct; 8(4):308-12. PubMed ID: 15874878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cervical endometriosis: a diagnostic and management dilemma.
    Phadnis SV; Doshi JS; Ogunnaike O; Coady A; Padwick M; Sanusi FA
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Oct; 272(4):289-93. PubMed ID: 16021490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Lubricant, mucus, and other contaminant materials as a potential source of interpretation errors in ThinPrep cervical cytology.
    AbdullGaffar B; Kamal MO; Khalid M; Samuel R; AlGhufli R
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2010 Jan; 14(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 20040832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cyto-histological correlates in a colposcopic clinic: a 1-year prospective study.
    Joseph MG; Cragg F; Wright VC; Kontozoglou TE; Downing P; Marks FR
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1991; 7(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 1954825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Are significant numbers of abnormal cells lost on the discarded ThinPrep® broom when used for cervical cytology?
    Umana A; Dunsmore H; Herbert A; Jokhan A; Kubba A
    Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):228-34. PubMed ID: 23171273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Presence of 20% or more clue cells: an accurate criterion for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in Papanicolaou cervical smears.
    Discacciati MG; Simoes JA; Amaral RG; Brolazo E; Rabelo-Santos SH; Westin MC; Montemor EB
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Apr; 34(4):272-6. PubMed ID: 16544334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Changing terminology and screening recommendations in cervical cytology screening programs.
    Robertson DI; Srivannaboon S; Pairwuti S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1992 Jan; 75 Suppl 1():90-3. PubMed ID: 1402489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.