These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18973465)

  • 1. Introduction of non-linearity by data transformation in method comparison and commutability studies.
    Stöckl D; Thienpont LM
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2008; 46(12):1784-5. PubMed ID: 18973465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of methods to handle skew distributed cost variables in the analysis of the resource consumption in schizophrenia treatment.
    Kilian R; Matschinger H; Löeffler W; Roick C; Angermeyer MC
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2002 Mar; 5(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12529567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of four regression frameworks with varying precision profiles in simulated reference material commutability assessment.
    Markus C; Tan RZ; Lim CY; Rankin W; Matthews SJ; Loh TP; Hague WM
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2022 Jul; 60(8):1164-1174. PubMed ID: 35647783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of linear regression methods when both variables contain error: relation to clinical studies.
    Parish RC
    DICP; 1989 Nov; 23(11):891-98. PubMed ID: 2596133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Permissible performance limits of regression analyses in method comparisons.
    Haeckel R; Wosniok W; Al Shareef N
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 49(11):1805-16. PubMed ID: 21815870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On using summary statistics from an external calibration sample to correct for covariate measurement error.
    Guo Y; Little RJ; McConnell DS
    Epidemiology; 2012 Jan; 23(1):165-74. PubMed ID: 22157312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regression analysis with covariates that have heteroscedastic measurement error.
    Guo Y; Little RJ
    Stat Med; 2011 Aug; 30(18):2278-94. PubMed ID: 21590792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of methods: Passing and Bablok regression.
    Bilić-Zulle L
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2011; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 22141206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A two-dimensional mathematical model of non-linear dual-sorption of percutaneous drug absorption.
    George K
    Biomed Eng Online; 2005 Jul; 4():40. PubMed ID: 15992411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg's formula.
    Springate SD
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21447784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing methods of measurements.
    Ludbrook J
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1997 Feb; 24(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 9075596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A heteroscedastic measurement error model for method comparison data with replicate measurements.
    Nawarathna LS; Choudhary PK
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(7):1242-58. PubMed ID: 25614299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of instrument error and method agreement.
    Chatburn RL
    AANA J; 1996 Jun; 64(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 9095698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Different percentages of false-positive results obtained using five methods for the calculation of reference change values based on simulated normal and ln-normal distributions of data.
    Lund F; Petersen PH; Fraser CG; Sölétormos G
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2016 Nov; 53(6):692-698. PubMed ID: 27151961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A multi-stage Gaussian transformation algorithm for clinical laboratory data.
    Boyd JC; Lacher DA
    Clin Chem; 1982 Aug; 28(8):1735-41. PubMed ID: 7094293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk of using logistic regression to illustrate exposure-response relationship of infectious diseases.
    Ren J; Ning Z; Kirkness CS; Asche CV; Wang H
    BMC Infect Dis; 2014 Oct; 14():540. PubMed ID: 25282153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Data transformation and normalization].
    Nishida T
    Rinsho Byori; 2010 Oct; 58(10):990-7. PubMed ID: 21077289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On statistical evaluation of the linearity in assay validation.
    Hsieh E; Liu JP
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(4):677-90. PubMed ID: 18607801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new outlier identification test for method comparison studies based on robust regression.
    Rauch G; Geistanger A; Timm J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jan; 21(1):151-69. PubMed ID: 21191861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Calculation of reference values for lung function tests.
    Dirksen A; Groth S
    Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir; 1986; 22(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 3730640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.