264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18973859)
1. Dosimetric verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy of 172 patients treated for various disease sites: comparison of EBT film dosimetry, ion chamber measurements, and independent MU calculations.
Wilcox EE; Daskalov GM; Pavlonnis G; Shumway R; Kaplan B; VanRooy E
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 18973859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the epson expression 1680 flatbed and the vidar VXR-16 dosimetry PRO film scanners for use in IMRT dosimetry using gafchromic and radiographic film.
Wilcox E; Daskalov G; Nedialkova L
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 17278488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetric verification of brain and head and neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment using EDR2 films and 2D ion chamber array matrix.
Varatharaj C; Ravikumar M; Sathiyan S; Supe SS; Vivek TR; Manikandan A
J Cancer Res Ther; 2010; 6(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 20622365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Kodak EDR2 and Gafchromic EBT film for intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose distribution verification.
Sankar A; Ayyangar KM; Nehru RM; Kurup PG; Murali V; Enke CA; Velmurugan J
Med Dosim; 2006; 31(4):273-82. PubMed ID: 17134667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monte Carlo simulations to replace film dosimetry in IMRT verification.
Goetzfried T; Rickhey M; Treutwein M; Koelbl O; Bogner L
Z Med Phys; 2011; 21(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 20888202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiotherapy feasibility study for a filmless approach.
Wiezorek T; Banz N; Schwedas M; Scheithauer M; Salz H; Georg D; Wendt TG
Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Jul; 181(7):468-74. PubMed ID: 15995841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation criteria for film based intensity modulated radiation therapy quality assurance.
Anjum MN; Parker W; Ruo R; Afzal M
Phys Med; 2010 Jan; 26(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 19620015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose prescription, recording, and delivery: patterns of variability among institutions and treatment planning systems.
Das IJ; Cheng CW; Chopra KL; Mitra RK; Srivastava SP; Glatstein E
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Mar; 100(5):300-7. PubMed ID: 18314476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient-specific IMRT verification using independent fluence-based dose calculation software: experimental benchmarking and initial clinical experience.
Georg D; Stock M; Kroupa B; Olofsson J; Nyholm T; Ahnesjö A; Karlsson M
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4981-92. PubMed ID: 17671348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose verification in clinical IMRT prostate incidents.
Sandilos P; Angelopoulos A; Baras P; Dardoufas K; Karaiskos P; Kipouros P; Kozicki M; Rosiak JM; Sakelliou L; Seimenis I; Vlahos L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Aug; 59(5):1540-7. PubMed ID: 15275742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of the dose calculation accuracy for IMRT in lung: a 2D approach.
Dvorak P; Stock M; Kroupa B; Bogner J; Georg D
Acta Oncol; 2007; 46(7):928-36. PubMed ID: 17917824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A methodology for verification of radiotherapy dose calculation.
Agazaryan N; Ullrich W; Lee SP; Solberg TD
J Neurosurg; 2004 Nov; 101 Suppl 3():356-61. PubMed ID: 15537190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs. conventional IMRT in head-and-neck cancer: a comparative planning and dosimetric study.
Verbakel WF; Cuijpers JP; Hoffmans D; Bieker M; Slotman BJ; Senan S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 May; 74(1):252-9. PubMed ID: 19362244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. IMRT implementation and patient specific dose verification with film and ion chamber array detectors.
Sathiyan S; Ravikumar M; Varatharaj C; Supe SS; Keshava SL
Gulf J Oncolog; 2010 Jul; (8):20-7. PubMed ID: 20601335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric verification for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of thoracic cancers using experimental and Monte Carlo approaches.
Jang SY; Liu HH; Wang X; Vassiliev ON; Siebers JV; Dong L; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Nov; 66(3):939-48. PubMed ID: 17011466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy: effective and efficient end-to-end patient-specific quality assurance.
O'Daniel J; Das S; Wu QJ; Yin FF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Apr; 82(5):1567-74. PubMed ID: 21470797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Agreement criteria between expected and measured field fluences in IMRT of head and neck cancer: the importance and use of the gamma histograms statistical analysis.
De Martin E; Fiorino C; Broggi S; Longobardi B; Pierelli A; Perna L; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Dec; 85(3):399-406. PubMed ID: 17980925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric pre-treatment verification of IMRT using an EPID; clinical experience.
van Zijtveld M; Dirkx ML; de Boer HC; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Nov; 81(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 17055604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A clinical application of an automated phantom-film QA procedure for validation of IMRT treatment planning and delivery.
Kapulsky A; Gejerman G; Hanley J
Med Dosim; 2004; 29(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 15528070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of monitor unit software and the application of action levels.
Georg D; Nyholm T; Olofsson J; Kjaer-Kristoffersen F; Schnekenburger B; Winkler P; Nyström H; Ahnesjö A; Karlsson M
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Nov; 85(2):306-15. PubMed ID: 17904234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
