These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18974067)

  • 1. A study of the frictional characteristics of four commercially available self-ligating bracket systems.
    Budd S; Daskalogiannakis J; Tompson BD
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):645-53. PubMed ID: 18974067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conventionally ligated versus self-ligating metal brackets--a comparative study.
    Reicheneder CA; Gedrange T; Berrisch S; Proff P; Baumert U; Faltermeier A; Muessig D
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 19028673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Archwire depth is a significant parameter in the frictional resistance of active and interactive, but not passive, self-ligating brackets.
    Oliver CL; Daskalogiannakis J; Tompson BD
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Nov; 81(6):1036-44. PubMed ID: 21699367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Friction between various self-ligating brackets and archwire couples during sliding mechanics.
    Stefanos S; Secchi AG; Coby G; Tanna N; Mante FK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Oct; 138(4):463-467. PubMed ID: 20889052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination.
    Sridharan K; Sandbhor S; Rajasekaran UB; Sam G; Ramees MM; Abraham EA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):660-664. PubMed ID: 28816185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Friction behavior of self-ligating and conventional brackets with different ligature systems.
    Szczupakowski A; Reimann S; Dirk C; Keilig L; Weber A; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jul; 77(4):287-95. PubMed ID: 27220902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Third-order torque and self-ligating orthodontic bracket-type effects on sliding friction.
    Chung M; Nikolai RJ; Kim KB; Oliver DR
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):551-7. PubMed ID: 19413378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative in vitro study of the frictional characteristics of two types of self-ligating brackets and two types of pre-adjusted edgewise brackets tied with elastomeric ligatures.
    Thomas S; Sherriff M; Birnie D
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Oct; 20(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 9825561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems.
    Read-Ward GE; Jones SP; Davies EH
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 9459030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwires in the buccal segments.
    Taylor NG; Ison K
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(3):215-22. PubMed ID: 8805917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of frictional forces in active and passive self-ligating brackets with various archwire alloys.
    Krishnan M; Kalathil S; Abraham KM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):675-82. PubMed ID: 19892284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In-vitro evaluation of frictional resistance with 5 ligation methods and Gianelly-type working wires.
    Kahlon S; Rinchuse D; Robison JM; Close JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 20620835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the forces required to produce tooth movement in vitro using two self-ligating brackets and a pre-adjusted bracket employing two types of ligation.
    Sims AP; Waters NE; Birnie DJ; Pethybridge RJ
    Eur J Orthod; 1993 Oct; 15(5):377-85. PubMed ID: 8223972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro evaluation of the frictional forces between brackets and archwire with three passive self-ligating brackets.
    Cordasco G; Farronato G; Festa F; Nucera R; Parazzoli E; Grossi GB
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Dec; 31(6):643-6. PubMed ID: 19797412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative Evaluation of Frictional Resistance Between Different Types of Ceramic Brackets and Stainless Steel Brackets With Teflon-Coated Stainless Steel and Stainless Steel Archwires: An In-Vitro Study.
    Bhat KRR; Ahmed N; Joseph R; Younus A A
    Cureus; 2022 Apr; 14(4):e24161. PubMed ID: 35586355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of methods of archwire ligation on frictional resistance.
    Khambay B; Millett D; McHugh S
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Jun; 26(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 15222719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An in vitro investigation of the influence of self-ligating brackets, low friction ligatures, and archwire on frictional resistance.
    Tecco S; Di Iorio D; Cordasco G; Verrocchi I; Festa F
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 17702800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of frictional forces during dental alignment: an experimental model with 3 nonleveled brackets.
    Matarese G; Nucera R; Militi A; Mazza M; Portelli M; Festa F; Cordasco G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):708-15. PubMed ID: 18456144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frictional Forces of Three Types of Lingual Appliance with Self-ligating Mechanisms.
    Zuñiga-Heredia EE; Muguruma T; Kawamura N; Iijima M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jun; 22(6):605-609. PubMed ID: 34393114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model.
    Tecco S; Festa F; Caputi S; Traini T; Di Iorio D; D'Attilio M
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1041-5. PubMed ID: 16448253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.