267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18974067)
1. A study of the frictional characteristics of four commercially available self-ligating bracket systems.
Budd S; Daskalogiannakis J; Tompson BD
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):645-53. PubMed ID: 18974067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Conventionally ligated versus self-ligating metal brackets--a comparative study.
Reicheneder CA; Gedrange T; Berrisch S; Proff P; Baumert U; Faltermeier A; Muessig D
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 19028673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Archwire depth is a significant parameter in the frictional resistance of active and interactive, but not passive, self-ligating brackets.
Oliver CL; Daskalogiannakis J; Tompson BD
Angle Orthod; 2011 Nov; 81(6):1036-44. PubMed ID: 21699367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Friction between various self-ligating brackets and archwire couples during sliding mechanics.
Stefanos S; Secchi AG; Coby G; Tanna N; Mante FK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Oct; 138(4):463-467. PubMed ID: 20889052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination.
Sridharan K; Sandbhor S; Rajasekaran UB; Sam G; Ramees MM; Abraham EA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):660-664. PubMed ID: 28816185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Friction behavior of self-ligating and conventional brackets with different ligature systems.
Szczupakowski A; Reimann S; Dirk C; Keilig L; Weber A; Jäger A; Bourauel C
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jul; 77(4):287-95. PubMed ID: 27220902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Third-order torque and self-ligating orthodontic bracket-type effects on sliding friction.
Chung M; Nikolai RJ; Kim KB; Oliver DR
Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):551-7. PubMed ID: 19413378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative in vitro study of the frictional characteristics of two types of self-ligating brackets and two types of pre-adjusted edgewise brackets tied with elastomeric ligatures.
Thomas S; Sherriff M; Birnie D
Eur J Orthod; 1998 Oct; 20(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 9825561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems.
Read-Ward GE; Jones SP; Davies EH
Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 9459030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwires in the buccal segments.
Taylor NG; Ison K
Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(3):215-22. PubMed ID: 8805917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative evaluation of frictional forces in active and passive self-ligating brackets with various archwire alloys.
Krishnan M; Kalathil S; Abraham KM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):675-82. PubMed ID: 19892284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In-vitro evaluation of frictional resistance with 5 ligation methods and Gianelly-type working wires.
Kahlon S; Rinchuse D; Robison JM; Close JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 20620835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the forces required to produce tooth movement in vitro using two self-ligating brackets and a pre-adjusted bracket employing two types of ligation.
Sims AP; Waters NE; Birnie DJ; Pethybridge RJ
Eur J Orthod; 1993 Oct; 15(5):377-85. PubMed ID: 8223972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro evaluation of the frictional forces between brackets and archwire with three passive self-ligating brackets.
Cordasco G; Farronato G; Festa F; Nucera R; Parazzoli E; Grossi GB
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Dec; 31(6):643-6. PubMed ID: 19797412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative Evaluation of Frictional Resistance Between Different Types of Ceramic Brackets and Stainless Steel Brackets With Teflon-Coated Stainless Steel and Stainless Steel Archwires: An In-Vitro Study.
Bhat KRR; Ahmed N; Joseph R; Younus A A
Cureus; 2022 Apr; 14(4):e24161. PubMed ID: 35586355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of methods of archwire ligation on frictional resistance.
Khambay B; Millett D; McHugh S
Eur J Orthod; 2004 Jun; 26(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 15222719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An in vitro investigation of the influence of self-ligating brackets, low friction ligatures, and archwire on frictional resistance.
Tecco S; Di Iorio D; Cordasco G; Verrocchi I; Festa F
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 17702800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of frictional forces during dental alignment: an experimental model with 3 nonleveled brackets.
Matarese G; Nucera R; Militi A; Mazza M; Portelli M; Festa F; Cordasco G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):708-15. PubMed ID: 18456144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Frictional Forces of Three Types of Lingual Appliance with Self-ligating Mechanisms.
Zuñiga-Heredia EE; Muguruma T; Kawamura N; Iijima M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jun; 22(6):605-609. PubMed ID: 34393114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model.
Tecco S; Festa F; Caputi S; Traini T; Di Iorio D; D'Attilio M
Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1041-5. PubMed ID: 16448253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
