These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18974203)

  • 1. Pitch perception and auditory stream segregation: implications for hearing loss and cochlear implants.
    Oxenham AJ
    Trends Amplif; 2008 Dec; 12(4):316-31. PubMed ID: 18974203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.
    Goldsworthy RL; Delhorne LA; Braida LD; Reed CM
    Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 23429419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing.
    Oxenham AJ; Kreft HA
    Trends Hear; 2014 Oct; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.
    McDermott HJ
    Trends Amplif; 2004; 8(2):49-82. PubMed ID: 15497033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time-frequency masking for speech separation and its potential for hearing aid design.
    DeLiang Wang
    Trends Amplif; 2008 Dec; 12(4):332-53. PubMed ID: 18974204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stream segregation on a single electrode as a function of pulse rate in cochlear implant listeners.
    Duran SI; Collins LM; Throckmorton CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3849-55. PubMed ID: 23231115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pitch and lexical tone perception of bilingual English-Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant recipients, hearing aid users, and normally hearing listeners.
    Looi V; Teo ER; Loo J
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S91-S104. PubMed ID: 26561892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia.
    Cooper WB; Tobey E; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):618-26. PubMed ID: 18469714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech perception with F0mod, a cochlear implant pitch coding strategy.
    Francart T; Osses A; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 25697275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Superoptimal Perceptual Integration Suggests a Place-Based Representation of Pitch at High Frequencies.
    Lau BK; Mehta AH; Oxenham AJ
    J Neurosci; 2017 Sep; 37(37):9013-9021. PubMed ID: 28821642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.
    Carroll J; Tiaden S; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2054-62. PubMed ID: 21973360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pitch, harmonicity and concurrent sound segregation: psychoacoustical and neurophysiological findings.
    Micheyl C; Oxenham AJ
    Hear Res; 2010 Jul; 266(1-2):36-51. PubMed ID: 19788920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A cochlear implant user with exceptional musical hearing ability.
    Maarefvand M; Marozeau J; Blamey PJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 23509878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users on speech recognition with competing talker, music perception, affective prosody discrimination, and talker identification.
    Cullington HE; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 21178567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation.
    Bierer JA
    Trends Amplif; 2010 Jun; 14(2):84-95. PubMed ID: 20724356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of room acoustic parameters on speech and music perception among participants with cochlear implants.
    Eurich B; Klenzner T; Oehler M
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():122-132. PubMed ID: 30933704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electroacoustic Stimulation.
    Li C; Kuhlmey M; Kim AH
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2019 Apr; 52(2):311-322. PubMed ID: 30617011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test.
    Kang R; Nimmons GL; Drennan W; Longnion J; Ruffin C; Nie K; Won JH; Worman T; Yueh B; Rubinstein J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 19474735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of extreme adaptive frequency compression in bimodal listeners on sound localization and speech perception.
    Veugen LCE; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; van Opstal AJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Sep; 18(5):266-277. PubMed ID: 28726592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.