BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18975694)

  • 1. The effect of breast compression on mass conspicuity in digital mammography.
    Saunders RS; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4464-73. PubMed ID: 18975694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can compression be reduced for breast tomosynthesis? Monte carlo study on mass and microcalcification conspicuity in tomosynthesis.
    Saunders RS; Samei E; Lo JY; Baker JA
    Radiology; 2009 Jun; 251(3):673-82. PubMed ID: 19474373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal photon energy comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography: a case study.
    Di Maria S; Baptista M; Felix M; Oliveira N; Matela N; Janeiro L; Vaz P; Orvalho L; Silva A
    Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 24613514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scatter radiation in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.
    Sechopoulos I; Suryanarayanan S; Vedantham S; D'Orsi CJ; Karellas A
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):564-76. PubMed ID: 17388174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Case for Wide-Angle Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Samei E; Thompson J; Richard S; Bowsher J
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):860-9. PubMed ID: 25920335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.
    Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. X-ray spectrum optimization of full-field digital mammography: simulation and phantom study.
    Bernhardt P; Mertelmeier T; Hoheisel M
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4337-49. PubMed ID: 17153413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A search for optimal x-ray spectra in iodine contrast media mammography.
    Ullman G; Sandborg M; Dance DR; Yaffe M; Alm Carlsson G
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3143-52. PubMed ID: 15972986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of reduced breast compression in breast tomosynthesis: human observer study using clinical cases.
    Förnvik D; Andersson I; Svahn T; Timberg P; Zackrisson S; Tingberg A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):118-23. PubMed ID: 20228049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
    Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dual-energy digital mammography: calibration and inverse-mapping techniques to estimate calcification thickness and glandular-tissue ratio.
    Kappadath SC; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1110-7. PubMed ID: 12852535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of the glandular composition on digital breast tomosynthesis image quality and dose optimisation.
    Marques T; Ribeiro A; Di Maria S; Belchior A; Cardoso J; Matela N; Oliveira N; Janeiro L; Almeida P; Vaz P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):337-41. PubMed ID: 25836692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography.
    Kaufhold J; Thomas JA; Eberhard JW; Galbo CE; Trotter DE
    Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1867-80. PubMed ID: 12201434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of the glandular breast dose for a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Rodrigues L; Magalhaes LA; Braz D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 25480841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterization of scatter in digital mammography from use of Monte Carlo simulations and comparison to physical measurements.
    Leon SM; Brateman LF; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111914. PubMed ID: 25370647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Average glandular dose in routine mammography screening using a Sectra MicroDose Mammography unit.
    Hemdal B; Herrnsdorf L; Andersson I; Bengtsson G; Heddson B; Olsson M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):436-43. PubMed ID: 15933152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: scatter and nonuniformity corrections.
    Kappadath SC; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3395-408. PubMed ID: 16372415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An iterative three-dimensional electron density imaging algorithm using uncollimated compton scattered x rays from a polyenergetic primary pencil beam.
    Van Uytven E; Pistorius S; Gordon R
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):256-65. PubMed ID: 17278511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Region-based wavelet coding methods for digital mammography.
    Penedo M; Pearlman WA; Tahoces PG; Souto M; Vidal JJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Oct; 22(10):1288-96. PubMed ID: 14552582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: patient radiation dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code.
    Yakoumakis E; Tzamicha E; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):369-72. PubMed ID: 25836682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.