These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18976476)

  • 1. Fully Bayesian tests of neutrality using genealogical summary statistics.
    Drummond AJ; Suchard MA
    BMC Genet; 2008 Oct; 9():68. PubMed ID: 18976476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring the degree of starshape in genealogies--summary statistics and demographic inference.
    Lohse K; Kelleher J
    Genet Res (Camb); 2009 Aug; 91(4):281-92. PubMed ID: 19640323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical power analysis of neutrality tests under demographic expansions, contractions and bottlenecks with recombination.
    Ramírez-Soriano A; Ramos-Onsins SE; Rozas J; Calafell F; Navarro A
    Genetics; 2008 May; 179(1):555-67. PubMed ID: 18493071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of implausible phylogenetic inferences using posterior predictive assessment of model fit.
    Brown JM
    Syst Biol; 2014 May; 63(3):334-48. PubMed ID: 24415681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evolution of the human immunodeficiency virus envelope gene is dominated by purifying selection.
    Edwards CT; Holmes EC; Pybus OG; Wilson DJ; Viscidi RP; Abrams EJ; Phillips RE; Drummond AJ
    Genetics; 2006 Nov; 174(3):1441-53. PubMed ID: 16951087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequency spectrum neutrality tests: one for all and all for one.
    Achaz G
    Genetics; 2009 Sep; 183(1):249-58. PubMed ID: 19546320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An approximate bayesian estimator suggests strong, recurrent selective sweeps in Drosophila.
    Jensen JD; Thornton KR; Andolfatto P
    PLoS Genet; 2008 Sep; 4(9):e1000198. PubMed ID: 18802463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identifying loci under selection via explicit demographic models.
    Luqman H; Widmer A; Fior S; Wegmann D
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 Nov; 21(8):2719-2737. PubMed ID: 33964107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Approximate bayesian computation without summary statistics: the case of admixture.
    Sousa VC; Fritz M; Beaumont MA; Chikhi L
    Genetics; 2009 Apr; 181(4):1507-19. PubMed ID: 19189952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distinguishing positive selection from neutral evolution: boosting the performance of summary statistics.
    Lin K; Li H; Schlötterer C; Futschik A
    Genetics; 2011 Jan; 187(1):229-44. PubMed ID: 21041556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Likelihood-free inference of population structure and local adaptation in a Bayesian hierarchical model.
    Bazin E; Dawson KJ; Beaumont MA
    Genetics; 2010 Jun; 185(2):587-602. PubMed ID: 20382835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating summary statistics used to test for incomplete lineage sorting: mito-nuclear discordance in the reef sponge Callyspongia vaginalis.
    Debiasse MB; Nelson BJ; Hellberg ME
    Mol Ecol; 2014 Jan; 23(1):225-38. PubMed ID: 24283627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A method for accurate inference of population size from serially sampled genealogies distorted by selection.
    O'Fallon BD
    Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Nov; 28(11):3171-81. PubMed ID: 21680870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the use of kernel approximate Bayesian computation to infer population history.
    Nakagome S
    Genes Genet Syst; 2015; 90(3):153-62. PubMed ID: 26510570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new test for detecting recent positive selection that is free from the confounding impacts of demography.
    Li H
    Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Jan; 28(1):365-75. PubMed ID: 20709734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multivariate QST-FST comparisons: a neutrality test for the evolution of the g matrix in structured populations.
    Martin G; Chapuis E; Goudet J
    Genetics; 2008 Dec; 180(4):2135-49. PubMed ID: 18245845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methods to detect selection in populations with applications to the human.
    Kreitman M
    Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet; 2000; 1():539-59. PubMed ID: 11701640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Kernel approximate Bayesian computation in population genetic inferences.
    Nakagome S; Fukumizu K; Mano S
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 Dec; 12(6):667-78. PubMed ID: 24150124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gene genealogy and properties of test statistics of neutrality under population growth.
    Sano A; Tachida H
    Genetics; 2005 Mar; 169(3):1687-97. PubMed ID: 15545654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Postprocessing of genealogical trees.
    Meligkotsidou L; Fearnhead P
    Genetics; 2007 Sep; 177(1):347-58. PubMed ID: 17565950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.