These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18977245)

  • 1. An automated method for micro-state segmentation of evoked potentials.
    Hennings K; Lelic D; Petrini L
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Feb; 177(1):225-31. PubMed ID: 18977245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new method of spatio-temporal topographic mapping by correlation coefficient of K-means cluster.
    Li L; Yao D
    Brain Topogr; 2007; 19(4):161-76. PubMed ID: 17238000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency detection with stability coefficient for steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based BCIs.
    Wu Z; Yao D
    J Neural Eng; 2008 Mar; 5(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18310809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single-epoch analysis of interleaved evoked potentials and fMRI responses during steady-state visual stimulation.
    Bianciardi M; Bianchi L; Garreffa G; Abbafati M; Di Russo F; Marciani MG; Macaluso E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Apr; 120(4):738-47. PubMed ID: 19250866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Segmentation of brain electrical activity into microstates: model estimation and validation.
    Pascual-Marqui RD; Michel CM; Lehmann D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Jul; 42(7):658-65. PubMed ID: 7622149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Region-based current-source reconstruction for the inverse EEG problem.
    Peña J; Marroquin JL
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Apr; 58(4):1044-54. PubMed ID: 21156387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The reorganization of the spatial EEG correlation evoked by visual stimulation].
    Kropotkov IuD; Ponomarev VA; Ferri R
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1999; 25(3):25-33. PubMed ID: 10822621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Single-trial subspace-based approach for VEP extraction.
    Kamel N; Yusoff MZ; Hani AF
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 May; 58(5):1383-93. PubMed ID: 21177154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual evoked potential estimation by adaptive noise cancellation with neural-network-based fuzzy inference system.
    Zeng Y; Zhang J; Yin H; Pan Y
    J Med Eng Technol; 2007; 31(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 17454407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the signal-to-noise ratio for average evoked potentials: determination of interstimulus interval and averaging number.
    Nakamura M; Nishida S; Shibasaki H
    Front Med Biol Eng; 1989; 1(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 2486921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual evoked potential measurement by maximum length sequence technique.
    Lam FK; Chan FH; Poon PW; Du MH; Xu BZ
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1991; 1(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 1364634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attenuation of artifacts in EEG signals measured inside an MRI scanner using constrained independent component analysis.
    Rasheed T; Lee YK; Lee SY; Kim TS
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Apr; 30(4):387-404. PubMed ID: 19321919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scalp potential and current density mapping with an enhanced spherical spline interpolation.
    Hassainia F; Medina V; Donadey A; Langevin F
    Med Prog Technol; 1994; 20(1-2):23-30. PubMed ID: 7968861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic spatiotemporal brain analyses using high performance electrical neuroimaging: theoretical framework and validation.
    Cacioppo S; Weiss RM; Runesha HB; Cacioppo JT
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Dec; 238():11-34. PubMed ID: 25244954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Topographical characterization of normal visual evoked responses.
    Medina V; Grall Y; Menguy C; Langevin F; Gaillard P
    Med Prog Technol; 1994; 20(1-2):15-22. PubMed ID: 7968860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phase estimation of visual evoked responses.
    Pecher A; Husar P; Henning G; Roderer H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Mar; 50(3):324-33. PubMed ID: 12669989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Data-driven visualization and group analysis of multichannel EEG coherence with functional units.
    ten Caat M; Maurits NM; Roerdink JB
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2008; 14(4):756-71. PubMed ID: 18467752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subspace averaging of steady-state visual evoked potentials.
    Davila CE; Srebro R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Jun; 47(6):720-8. PubMed ID: 10833846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automatic segmentation of magnetic resonance images using a decision tree with spatial information.
    Chao WH; Chen YY; Lin SH; Shih YY; Tsang S
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Mar; 33(2):111-21. PubMed ID: 19097854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel multiple frequency stimulation method for steady state VEP based brain computer interfaces.
    Srihari Mukesh TM; Jaganathan V; Reddy MR
    Physiol Meas; 2006 Jan; 27(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 16365511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.