277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18977304)
1. The sensory-motor specificity of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations: a behavioral and fMRI study.
Kalénine S; Peyrin C; Pichat C; Segebarth C; Bonthoux F; Baciu M
Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(3):1152-62. PubMed ID: 18977304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Categorical and thematic knowledge representation in the brain: neural correlates of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations.
Sachs O; Weis S; Krings T; Huber W; Kircher T
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(2):409-18. PubMed ID: 17920085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic processing of semantic relations in fMRI: neural activation during semantic priming of taxonomic and thematic categories.
Sachs O; Weis S; Zellagui N; Huber W; Zvyagintsev M; Mathiak K; Kircher T
Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1218():194-205. PubMed ID: 18514168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Boronat CB; Buxbaum LJ; Coslett HB; Tang K; Saffran EM; Kimberg DY; Detre JA
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 May; 23(2-3):361-73. PubMed ID: 15820643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Taxonomic and thematic categories: Neural correlates of categorization in an auditory-to-visual priming task using fMRI.
Sass K; Sachs O; Krach S; Kircher T
Brain Res; 2009 May; 1270():78-87. PubMed ID: 19306848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Thematic knowledge, artifact concepts, and the left posterior temporal lobe: Where action and object semantics converge.
Kalénine S; Buxbaum LJ
Cortex; 2016 Sep; 82():164-178. PubMed ID: 27389801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neural substrates of knowledge of hand postures for object grasping and functional object use: evidence from fMRI.
Buxbaum LJ; Kyle KM; Tang K; Detre JA
Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1117(1):175-85. PubMed ID: 16962075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The function of words: distinct neural correlates for words denoting differently manipulable objects.
Rueschemeyer SA; van Rooij D; Lindemann O; Willems RM; Bekkering H
J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Aug; 22(8):1844-51. PubMed ID: 19583471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. When action turns into words. Activation of motor-based knowledge during categorization of manipulable objects.
Gerlach C; Law I; Paulson OB
J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Nov; 14(8):1230-9. PubMed ID: 12495528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Body schematics: on the role of the body schema in embodied lexical-semantic representations.
Rueschemeyer SA; Pfeiffer C; Bekkering H
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Feb; 48(3):774-81. PubMed ID: 19782094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A saw is first identified as an object used on wood: ERP evidence for temporal differences between Thematic and Functional similarity relations.
Wamain Y; Pluciennicka E; Kalénine S
Neuropsychologia; 2015 May; 71():28-37. PubMed ID: 25725356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The functional neuroanatomy of thematic role and locative relational knowledge.
Wu DH; Waller S; Chatterjee A
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Sep; 19(9):1542-55. PubMed ID: 17714015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Categorization by schema relations and perceptual similarity in 5-year-olds and adults: A study in vision and in audition.
Berger C; Donnadieu S
J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Apr; 93(4):304-21. PubMed ID: 16330042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The neural basis of overall similarity and single-dimension sorting.
Milton F; Wills AJ; Hodgson TL
Neuroimage; 2009 May; 46(1):319-26. PubMed ID: 19457383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Object manipulability affects children's and adults' conceptual processing.
Kalénine S; Bonthoux F
Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Jun; 15(3):667-72. PubMed ID: 18567272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of complex action knowledge on representations of novel graspable objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Creem-Regehr SH; Dilda V; Vicchrilli AE; Federer F; Lee JN
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2007 Nov; 13(6):1009-20. PubMed ID: 17942019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences in processing of taxonomic and sequential relations in semantic memory: an fMRI investigation.
Kuchinke L; Meer Ev; Krueger F
Brain Cogn; 2009 Mar; 69(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 18796346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. FMRI-adaptation to highly-rendered color photographs of animals and manipulable artifacts during a classification task.
Chouinard PA; Goodale MA
Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):2941-51. PubMed ID: 22015854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Actions speak louder than functions: the importance of manipulability and action in tool representation.
Kellenbach ML; Brett M; Patterson K
J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jan; 15(1):30-46. PubMed ID: 12590841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is motor knowledge part and parcel of the concepts of manipulable artifacts? Clues from a case of upper limb aplasia.
Vannuscorps G; Andres M; Pillon A
Brain Cogn; 2014 Feb; 84(1):132-40. PubMed ID: 24365637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
