537 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18977375)
1. Development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict the carcinogenic potency of chemicals I. Alternative toxicity measures as an estimator of carcinogenic potency.
Venkatapathy R; Wang CY; Bruce RM; Moudgal C
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2009 Jan; 234(2):209-21. PubMed ID: 18977375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict the carcinogenic potency of chemicals. II. Using oral slope factor as a measure of carcinogenic potency.
Wang NC; Venkatapathy R; Bruce RM; Moudgal C
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Mar; 59(2):215-26. PubMed ID: 20951756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
Gaylor DW
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of QSAR models for predicting hepatocarcinogenic toxicity of chemicals.
Massarelli I; Imbriani M; Coi A; Saraceno M; Carli N; Bianucci AM
Eur J Med Chem; 2009 Sep; 44(9):3658-64. PubMed ID: 19272677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative structure activity relationship for the computational prediction of nitrocompounds carcinogenicity.
Morales AH; Pérez MA; Combes RD; González MP
Toxicology; 2006 Mar; 220(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 16414170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative structure-activity relationship modelling of the carcinogenic risk of nitroso compounds using regression analysis and the TOPS-MODE approach.
Helguera AM; Pérez-Machado G; Cordeiro MN; Combes RD
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Apr; 21(3-4):277-304. PubMed ID: 20544552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Structure-activity relationship analysis tools: validation and applicability in predicting carcinogens.
Mayer J; Cheeseman MA; Twaroski ML
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Feb; 50(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 18023949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A topological substructural approach applied to the computational prediction of rodent carcinogenicity.
Helguera AM; Cabrera Pérez MA; González MP; Ruiz RM; González Díaz H
Bioorg Med Chem; 2005 Apr; 13(7):2477-88. PubMed ID: 15755650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A measure of tumorigenic potency incorporating dose-response shape.
Meier KL; Bailer AJ; Portier CJ
Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):917-26. PubMed ID: 8241378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided rodent carcinogenicity prediction.
Lagunin AA; Dearden JC; Filimonov DA; Poroikov VV
Mutat Res; 2005 Oct; 586(2):138-46. PubMed ID: 16112600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative analysis of predictive models for nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogenicity using both toxicogenomics and quantitative structure-activity relationships.
Liu Z; Kelly R; Fang H; Ding D; Tong W
Chem Res Toxicol; 2011 Jul; 24(7):1062-70. PubMed ID: 21627106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative structure-carcinogenicity relationship for detecting structural alerts in nitroso compounds: species, rat; sex, female; route of administration, gavage.
Morales Helguera A; Pérez González M; Dias Soeiro Cordeiro MN; Cabrera Pérez MA
Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 21(3):633-42. PubMed ID: 18293904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative structure carcinogenicity relationship for detecting structural alerts in nitroso-compounds.
Helguera AM; González MP; D S Cordeiro MN; Pérez MA
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jun; 221(2):189-202. PubMed ID: 17477948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experimental design constraints on carcinogenic potency estimates.
Rieth JP; Starr TB
J Toxicol Environ Health; 1989; 27(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 2754755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the oral rat chronic lowest observed adverse effect level model in TOPKAT, a QSAR software package for toxicity prediction.
Venkatapathy R; Moudgal CJ; Bruce RM
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(5):1623-9. PubMed ID: 15446819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting carcinogenicity of diverse chemicals using probabilistic neural network modeling approaches.
Singh KP; Gupta S; Rai P
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2013 Oct; 272(2):465-75. PubMed ID: 23856075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chemicals classified by IARC: their potency in tests for carcinogenicity in rodents and their genotoxicity and acute toxicity.
McGregor DB
IARC Sci Publ; 1992; (116):323-52. PubMed ID: 1428089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An analysis of genetic toxicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, and carcinogenicity data: II. Identification of genotoxicants, reprotoxicants, and carcinogens using in silico methods.
Matthews EJ; Kruhlak NL; Cimino MC; Benz RD; Contrera JF
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 44(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 16352383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ESP: a method to predict toxicity and pharmacological properties of chemicals using multiple MCASE databases.
Klopman G; Chakravarti SK; Zhu H; Ivanov JM; Saiakhov RD
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(2):704-15. PubMed ID: 15032553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
