89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18978258)
21. Cemented calcar replacement femoral component in revision hybrid total hip arthroplasty.
Ito H; Tanino H; Yamanaka Y; Nakamura T; Minami A; Matsuno T
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Feb; 26(2):236-43. PubMed ID: 20381995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Total hip arthroplasty in the young adult.
Callaghan JJ; Forest EE; Sporer SM; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Nov; (344):257-62. PubMed ID: 9372776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Exeter Universal cemented femoral stem at 20 to 25 years: A report of 382 hips.
Petheram TG; Whitehouse SL; Kazi HA; Hubble MJ; Timperley AJ; Wilson MJ; Howell JR
Bone Joint J; 2016 Nov; 98-B(11):1441-1449. PubMed ID: 27803218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Results of the cemented Exeter femoral component in patients under the age of 40 : an update at ten to 20 years' follow-up.
Schmitz MW; Bronsema E; de Kam DC; Gardeniers JW; Veth RP; Schreurs BW
Bone Joint J; 2017 Feb; 99-B(2):192-198. PubMed ID: 28148660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in teenage patients: the ultimate challenge.
Wroblewski BM; Purbach B; Siney PD; Fleming PA
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Apr; 92(4):486-8. PubMed ID: 20357322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cement-in-cement femoral revisions using a specially designed polished short revision stem; 24 consecutive stems followed for five to seven years.
te Stroet MA; Moret-Wever SG; de Kam DC; Gardeniers JW; Schreurs BW
Hip Int; 2014; 24(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 24970322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The use of the cemented Exeter Universal femoral stem in a District General Hospital: a minimum ten-year follow-up.
Young L; Duckett S; Dunn A
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Feb; 91(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 19190048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Exeter Universal cemented femoral component.
Khatun F; Gill DF; Atrey A; Porteous M
Bone Joint J; 2020 Oct; 102-B(10):1319-1323. PubMed ID: 32993348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem: a concise follow-up, at fifteen to twenty years, of a previous report.
te Stroet MA; Gardeniers JW; Verdonschot N; Rijnen WH; Slooff TJ; Schreurs BW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Dec; 94(23):e1731-4. PubMed ID: 23224393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Exeter Universal cemented femoral component at 15 to 17 years: an update on the first 325 hips.
Carrington NC; Sierra RJ; Gie GA; Hubble MJ; Timperley AJ; Howell JR
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Jun; 91(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 19483224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical and radiological evaluation of revision hip arthroplasty using the cement-in-cement technique.
Goto K; Kawanabe K; Akiyama H; Morimoto T; Nakamura T
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Aug; 90(8):1013-8. PubMed ID: 18669955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Medium-term follow-up of 92 femoral component revisions using a third-generation cementing technique.
Te Stroet MA; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; Van Kampen A; Schreurs BW
Acta Orthop; 2016; 87(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 26569495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Revision total hip replacement using cemented collarless double-taper femoral components.
Howie DW; Wimhurst JA; McGee MA; Carbone TA; Badaruddin BS
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Jul; 89(7):879-86. PubMed ID: 17673579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Acceptable long-term results after Boneloc hip arthroplasty.
Thomsen PB; Dalsgaard J; Vainorius D; Hansen TB
Dan Med J; 2013 Aug; 60(8):A4671. PubMed ID: 23905563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The long-term outcome of hip replacement in adults with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: the influence of steroids and methotrexate.
Malviya A; Walker LC; Avery P; Osborne S; Weir DJ; Foster HE; Deehan DJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Apr; 93(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 21464480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Basis CL cemented femoral stem: results after 8.9 years follow-up.
Mai S; Golla M; Siebert WE
Hip Int; 2013; 23(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 23543471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Survival of cemented short Exeter femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty.
van Veghel MHW; van der Koelen RE; Hannink G; Schreurs BW; Rijnen WHC
Bone Joint J; 2024 Mar; 106-B(3 Supple A):137-142. PubMed ID: 38423113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Revision arthroplasty in aseptic loosening of cemented sockets of hip prosthesis].
Gaździk TS; Wójcik B; Niedźwiedzki Ł; Dec J
Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 2002; 67(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 12148185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Uncemented computer-assisted design-computer-assisted manufacture femoral components in revision total hip replacement: a minimum follow-up of ten years.
Muirhead-Allwood S; Sandiford NA; Skinner JA; Hua J; Muirhead W; Kabir C; Walker PS
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Oct; 92(10):1370-5. PubMed ID: 20884973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Uncompromised quality of the cement mantle in Exeter femoral components implanted through a minimally-invasive direct anterior approach. A prospective, randomised cadaver study.
Mayr E; Krismer M; Ertl M; Kessler O; Thaler M; Nogler M
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Sep; 88(9):1252-6. PubMed ID: 16943482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
