These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18978627)

  • 1. Kinetic comparison of free weight and machine power cleans.
    Jones RM; Fry AC; Weiss LW; Kinzey SJ; Moore CA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2008 Nov; 22(6):1785-9. PubMed ID: 18978627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Kinetic comparison of the power development between power clean variations.
    Suchomel TJ; Wright GA; Kernozek TW; Kline DE
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Feb; 28(2):350-60. PubMed ID: 23689341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of load and sex on kinematic and kinetic variables during the mid-thigh clean pull.
    Comfort P; Jones PA; Udall R
    Sports Biomech; 2015 Jun; 14(2):139-56. PubMed ID: 25896197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Redistributing load using wearable resistance during power clean training improves athletic performance.
    Marriner CR; Cronin JB; Macadam P; Storey A
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2017 Oct; 17(9):1101-1109. PubMed ID: 28792857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Kinetic comparisons during variations of the power clean.
    Comfort P; Allen M; Graham-Smith P
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Dec; 25(12):3269-73. PubMed ID: 22080325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of loading on kinematic and kinetic variables during the midthigh clean pull.
    Comfort P; Udall R; Jones PA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 May; 26(5):1208-14. PubMed ID: 22516901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Load-velocity relationship 1RM predictions: A comparison of Smith machine and free-weight exercise.
    Hughes LJ; Peiffer JJ; Scott BR
    J Sports Sci; 2020 Nov; 38(22):2562-2568. PubMed ID: 32669051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improvement of Kinetic, Kinematic, and Qualitative Performance Variables of the Power Clean With the Hook Grip.
    Oranchuk DJ; Drinkwater EJ; Lindsay RS; Helms ER; Harbour ET; Storey AG
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2019 Mar; 14(3):378-384. PubMed ID: 30204518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determination of optimal loading during the power clean, in collegiate athletes.
    Comfort P; Fletcher C; McMahon JJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Nov; 26(11):2970-4. PubMed ID: 22190161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Within- and between-session reliability of power, force, and rate of force development during the power clean.
    Comfort P
    J Strength Cond Res; 2013 May; 27(5):1210-4. PubMed ID: 22843043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of different relative intensities on power output during the hang power clean: identification of the optimal load.
    Kawamori N; Crum AJ; Blumert PA; Kulik JR; Childers JT; Wood JA; Stone MH; Haff GG
    J Strength Cond Res; 2005 Aug; 19(3):698-708. PubMed ID: 16095428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Smith machine counterbalance system affects measures of maximal bench press throw performance.
    Vingren JL; Buddhadev HH; Hill DW
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Jul; 25(7):1951-6. PubMed ID: 21701283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal loading for maximal power output during lower-body resistance exercises.
    Cormie P; McCaulley GO; Triplett NT; McBride JM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2007 Feb; 39(2):340-9. PubMed ID: 17277599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Test-Retest Reliability Between Free Weight and Machine-Based Movement Velocities.
    Miller RM; Freitas EDS; Heishman AD; Koziol KJ; Galletti BAR; Kaur J; Bemben MG
    J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Feb; 34(2):440-444. PubMed ID: 30199448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Kinematic and kinetic analysis of maximal velocity deadlifts performed with and without the inclusion of chain resistance.
    Swinton PA; Stewart AD; Keogh JW; Agouris I; Lloyd R
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Nov; 25(11):3163-74. PubMed ID: 21993040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No kinetic differences during variations of the power clean in inexperienced female collegiate athletes.
    Comfort P; McMahon JJ; Fletcher C
    J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Feb; 27(2):363-8. PubMed ID: 22465991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of strength on magnitude and mechanisms of adaptation to power training.
    Cormie P; McGuigan MR; Newton RU
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2010 Aug; 42(8):1566-81. PubMed ID: 20639724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Test-retest reliability of barbell velocity during the free-weight bench-press exercise.
    Stock MS; Beck TW; DeFreitas JM; Dillon MA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Jan; 25(1):171-7. PubMed ID: 21157383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The contribution of volume, technique, and load to single-repetition and total-repetition kinematics and kinetics in response to three loading schemes.
    Crewther BT; Cronin J; Keogh JW
    J Strength Cond Res; 2008 Nov; 22(6):1908-15. PubMed ID: 18841079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of power and velocity variables collected during the traditional and ballistic bench press exercise.
    García-Ramos A; Haff GG; Padial P; Feriche B
    Sports Biomech; 2018 Mar; 17(1):117-130. PubMed ID: 28632056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.