These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18980398)
41. Is the focus of attention in working memory expanded through practice? Oberauer K J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):197-214. PubMed ID: 16569141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Serial and parallel processes in working memory after practice. Oberauer K; Bialkova S J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Apr; 37(2):606-14. PubMed ID: 21463089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) enumerate large and small sequentially presented sets of items using analog numerical representations. Beran MJ J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Jan; 33(1):42-54. PubMed ID: 17227194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. More than just finding color: strategy in global visual search is shaped by learned target probabilities. Williams CC; Pollatsek A; Cave KR; Stroud MJ J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):688-99. PubMed ID: 19485685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Forward scanning in verbal working memory updating. Kessler Y; Oberauer K Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1770-6. PubMed ID: 25962687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Working memory plasticity in old age: practice gain, transfer, and maintenance. Li SC; Schmiedek F; Huxhold O; Röcke C; Smith J; Lindenberger U Psychol Aging; 2008 Dec; 23(4):731-42. PubMed ID: 19140644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Direct access to working memory contents. Bialkova S; Oberauer K Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(5):383-9. PubMed ID: 20178938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions. Schumacher EH; Schwarb H J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 May; 138(2):270-90. PubMed ID: 19397384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Intentional inhibition in memory and hallucinations: directed forgetting and updating. Soriano MF; Jiménez JF; Román P; Bajo MT Neuropsychology; 2009 Jan; 23(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 19210033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Can intertrial effects of features and dimensions be explained by a single theory? Becker SI J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1417-40. PubMed ID: 19045983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. How task representations guide attention: further evidence for the shielding function of task sets. Dreisbach G; Haider H J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):477-86. PubMed ID: 19271860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Binding serial order to representations in working memory: a spatial/verbal dissociation. Gmeindl L; Walsh M; Courtney SM Mem Cognit; 2011 Jan; 39(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 21264629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Eye movements are not a prerequisite for learning movement sequence timing through observation. Hayes SJ; Timmis MA; Bennett SJ Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jul; 131(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 19500770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Attentional costs and benefits in memory search. Homa D; Crain I; Milliken AM; Newton C Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 19353935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Declarative and procedural working memory updating processes are mutually facilitative. Sali AW; Egner T Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1858-1871. PubMed ID: 31875313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]