359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18980401)
1. Blocking of spatial learning between enclosure geometry and a local landmark.
Wilson PN; Alexander T
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1369-76. PubMed ID: 18980401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Blocking of goal-location learning based on shape.
Alexander T; Wilson SP; Wilson PN
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):694-708. PubMed ID: 19379044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enclosure shape influences cue competition effects and goal location learning.
Wilson PN; Alexander T
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1552-67. PubMed ID: 20119881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: generality across spatial configurations.
Sturz BR; Kelly DM; Brown MF
Anim Cogn; 2010 Mar; 13(2):341-9. PubMed ID: 19777275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatial reorientation: the effects of space size on the encoding of landmark and geometry information.
Chiandetti C; Regolin L; Sovrano VA; Vallortigara G
Anim Cogn; 2007 Apr; 10(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 17136416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiple landmarks, the encoding of environmental geometry and the spatial logics of a dual brain.
Chiesa AD; Pecchia T; Tommasi L; Vallortigara G
Anim Cogn; 2006 Oct; 9(4):281-93. PubMed ID: 16941155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spatial cognition based on geometry and landmarks in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus).
Chiesa AD; Speranza M; Tommasi L; Vallortigara G
Behav Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 175(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 16979247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Encoding of relative enclosure size in a dynamic three-dimensional virtual environment by humans.
Sturz BR; Kelly DM
Behav Processes; 2009 Oct; 82(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 19576273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How fish do geometry in large and in small spaces.
Sovrano VA; Bisazza A; Vallortigara G
Anim Cogn; 2007 Jan; 10(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 16794851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of reference frames and number of cues available on the spatial orientation of males and females in a virtual memory task.
Cánovas R; García RF; Cimadevilla JM
Behav Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 216(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 20655953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attention, awareness of contingencies, and control in spatial localization: a qualitative difference approach.
Vaquero JM; Fiacconi C; Milliken B
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1342-57. PubMed ID: 21038991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Orienting in virtual environments: How are surface features and environmental geometry weighted in an orientation task?
Kelly DM; Bischof WF
Cognition; 2008 Oct; 109(1):89-104. PubMed ID: 18834974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Newborns' perception of left-right spatial relations.
Gava L; Valenza E; Turati C
Child Dev; 2009; 80(6):1797-810. PubMed ID: 19930352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of cue types on sex differences in human spatial memory.
Chai XJ; Jacobs LF
Behav Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 208(2):336-42. PubMed ID: 19963014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Learning your way around town: how virtual taxicab drivers learn to use both layout and landmark information.
Newman EL; Caplan JB; Kirschen MP; Korolev IO; Sekuler R; Kahana MJ
Cognition; 2007 Aug; 104(2):231-53. PubMed ID: 16879816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gender differences in landmark learning for virtual navigation: the role of distance to a goal.
Chamizo VD; Artigas AA; Sansa J; Banterla F
Behav Processes; 2011 Sep; 88(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 21736927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transfer of route learning from virtual to real environments.
Farrell MJ; Arnold P; Pettifer S; Adams J; Graham T; MacManamon M
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2003 Dec; 9(4):219-27. PubMed ID: 14664673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Learned predictiveness training modulates biases towards using boundary or landmark cues during navigation.
Buckley MG; Smith AD; Haselgrove M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(6):1183-202. PubMed ID: 25409751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Learning about environmental geometry: an associative model.
Miller NY; Shettleworth SJ
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Jul; 33(3):191-212. PubMed ID: 17620021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Masking by object substitution: dissociation of masking and cuing effects.
Neill WT; Hutchison KA; Graves DF
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):682-94. PubMed ID: 12075896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
