These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18980503)

  • 41. Fit testing and comfort evaluation of prophylactic dressing use for healthcare workers under N95/P2 respirators in one health service district in Australia.
    Barakat-Johnson M; Stephenson J; Dempsey K; Innes L; Jain S; Leong T; Schouten T; Coyer F; Hallahan A
    J Hosp Infect; 2022 May; 123():100-107. PubMed ID: 35245647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A novel approach to fit testing the N95 respirator in real time in a clinical setting.
    Or P; Chung J; Wong T
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2016 Feb; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 24828795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of five methods for fit-testing N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
    Janssen L
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 Oct; 18(10):732-3; author reply 733-4. PubMed ID: 12959883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [The relationship between fit characteristics of two kinds of self-inhalation air-purifying dust respirators and head-face dimensions of subjects].
    Cheng WJ; Yu YY; Yu D; Ping J; Chen WH
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2012 May; 30(5):352-5. PubMed ID: 22804988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of the benefit of the user seal check on N95 filtering facepiece respirator fit.
    Viscusi DJ; Bergman MS; Zhuang Z; Shaffer RE
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(6):408-16. PubMed ID: 22606976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Recommended test methods and pass/fail criteria for a respirator fit capability test of half-mask air-purifying respirators.
    Zhuang Z; Bergman M; Lei Z; Niezgoda G; Shaffer R
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Jun; 14(6):473-481. PubMed ID: 28278067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. N95 filtering facepiece respirators do not reliably afford respiratory protection during chest compression: A simulation study.
    Hwang SY; Yoon H; Yoon A; Kim T; Lee G; Jung KY; Park JH; Shin TG; Cha WC; Sim MS; Kim S
    Am J Emerg Med; 2020 Jan; 38(1):12-17. PubMed ID: 30955924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The role of fit testing N95/FFP2/FFP3 masks: a narrative review.
    Regli A; Sommerfield A; von Ungern-Sternberg BS
    Anaesthesia; 2021 Jan; 76(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 32932556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of two quantitative fit-test methods using N95 filtering facepiece respirators.
    Sietsema M; Brosseau LM
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2016 Aug; 13(8):621-7. PubMed ID: 26963561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. In vivo protective performance of N95 respirator and surgical facemask.
    Li Y; Wong T; Chung J; Guo YP; Hu JY; Guan YT; Yao L; Song QW; Newton E
    Am J Ind Med; 2006 Dec; 49(12):1056-65. PubMed ID: 17096360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of five methods for fit-testing N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
    Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Zhuang Z; Campbell DL; Jensen PA; Myers WR
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Oct; 17(10):723-30. PubMed ID: 12363214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Performance of two respiratory protective devices used by home-attending health care workers (a pilot study).
    Elmashae RBY; Grinshpun SA; Reponen T; Yermakov M; Riddle R
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Sep; 14(9):D145-D149. PubMed ID: 28585893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Simulated workplace performance of N95 respirators.
    Coffey CC; Campbell DL; Zhuang Z
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(5):618-24. PubMed ID: 10529991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Inward leakage variability between respirator fit test panels - Part II. Probabilistic approach.
    Liu Y; Zhuang Z; Coffey CC; Rengasamy S; Niezgoda G
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2016 Aug; 13(8):604-11. PubMed ID: 26954018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Study on the relationship between the fitness of three types of N95 respirators and facial dimensions.
    Wang G; Luo C; Cui C; Huang J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2024 May; 21(5):319-325. PubMed ID: 38416473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Fitting characteristics of N95 filtering-facepiece respirators used widely in China.
    Yu Y; Jiang L; Zhuang Z; Liu Y; Wang X; Liu J; Yang M; Chen W
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85299. PubMed ID: 24465528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Are quantitative fit factors predictive of respirator fit during simulated healthcare activities?
    Sietsema M; Brosseau LM
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2018 Dec; 15(12):803-809. PubMed ID: 30142034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Does a Modified Adhesive Respirator Improve the Face Seal for Health Care Workers Who Previously Failed a Fit Test?: A Pilot Study During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.
    Wardhan R; Brennan MM; Brown HL; Creech TB
    A A Pract; 2020 Jun; 14(8):e01264. PubMed ID: 32643906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effect of fit testing on the protection offered by n95 filtering facepiece respirators against fine particles in a laboratory setting.
    Reponen T; Lee SA; Grinshpun SA; Johnson E; McKay R
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Apr; 55(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 21177265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A simple surgical mask modification to pass N95 respirator-equivalent fit testing standards during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Dardas AZ; Serra Lopez VM; Boden LM; Gittings DJ; Heym K; Koerber E; Grosh T; Ahn J
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0272834. PubMed ID: 36001554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.