These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18980694)

  • 1. Maximising response rates in household telephone surveys.
    O'Toole J; Sinclair M; Leder K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Nov; 8():71. PubMed ID: 18980694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sampling and coverage issues of telephone surveys used for collecting health information in Australia: results from a face-to-face survey from 1999 to 2008.
    Dal Grande E; Taylor AW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Aug; 10():77. PubMed ID: 20738884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does sampling using random digit dialling really cost more than sampling from telephone directories: debunking the myths.
    Yang B; Eyeson-Annan M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Feb; 6():6. PubMed ID: 16504117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increasing response rates in telephone surveys: a randomized trial.
    Smith W; Chey T; Jalaludin B; Salkeld G; Capon T
    J Public Health Med; 1995 Mar; 17(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 7786565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Methodology of a study on insomnia in the general population].
    Ohayon MM
    Encephale; 2002; 28(3 Pt 1):217-26. PubMed ID: 12091782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Random digit dialling and Electronic White Pages samples compared: demographic profiles and health estimates.
    Wilson DH; Starr GJ; Taylor AW; Dal Grande E
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 1999 Dec; 23(6):627-33. PubMed ID: 10641355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Collecting household water usage data: telephone questionnaire or diary?
    O'Toole JE; Sinclair MI; Leder K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Nov; 9():72. PubMed ID: 19900290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Random digit dialing and directory-based samples in telephone surveys of HIV risk: a comparison from the Australian Study of Health and Relationships.
    Smith AM; de Visser RO; Rissel CE
    Ann Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 15(3):232-5. PubMed ID: 15723770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adjustments for non-telephone bias in random-digit-dialling surveys.
    Frankel MR; Srinath KP; Hoaglin DC; Battaglia MP; Smith PJ; Wright RA; Khare M
    Stat Med; 2003 May; 22(9):1611-26. PubMed ID: 12704619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of response rates and cost-effectiveness for a community-based survey: postal, internet and telephone modes with generic or personalised recruitment approaches.
    Sinclair M; O'Toole J; Malawaraarachchi M; Leder K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Aug; 12():132. PubMed ID: 22938205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A population survey of the penetrance of contact lens wear in Australia: rationale, methodology and results.
    Edwards K; Keay L; Naduvilath T; Stapleton F
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2009; 16(5):275-80. PubMed ID: 19874106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of survey instrument on participation in a follow-up study: a randomization study of a mailed questionnaire versus a computer-assisted telephone interview.
    Rocheleau CM; Romitti PA; Sherlock SH; Sanderson WT; Bell EM; Druschel C
    BMC Public Health; 2012 Jul; 12():579. PubMed ID: 22849754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of results from an alcohol survey of a prerecruited Internet panel and the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.
    Heeren T; Edwards EM; Dennis JM; Rodkin S; Hingson RW; Rosenbloom DL
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2008 Feb; 32(2):222-9. PubMed ID: 18162076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Australian Electoral Commission Roll has good utility for 'niche' household recruitment in population health studies.
    O'Toole J; Rodrigo S; Sinclair M; Leder K
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2009 Apr; 33(2):137-9. PubMed ID: 19413856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Differences between listed and unlisted telephone subscribers among telephone survey respondents].
    Kigawa M; Nishikawa H
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 1998 Apr; 45(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 9691661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electronic telephone directory listings: preferred sampling frame for a population-based study of childhood cancer in Australia.
    Valery PC; Williams G; Mcwhirter W; Sleigh A; Scott D; Bain C
    Ann Epidemiol; 2000 Nov; 10(8):504-8. PubMed ID: 11118929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selection bias from sampling frames: telephone directory and electoral roll compared with door-to-door population census: results from the Blue Mountains Eye Study.
    Smith W; Mitchell P; Attebo K; Leeder S
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 1997 Apr; 21(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 9161066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) for health surveys in public health surveillance: methodological issues and challenges ahead.
    Choi BC
    Chronic Dis Can; 2004; 25(2):21-7. PubMed ID: 15554608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Application of a simple random sampling method on surveys at the community level].
    Lv J; Liu QM; Ren YJ; Wang WF; Gong T; Li LM
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Apr; 31(4):421-3. PubMed ID: 20513288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chapter V. A comparison of CATI and non-CATI questionnaires.
    Groves RM; Mathiowetz NA
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):33-9. PubMed ID: 15791754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.