168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18981169)
1. The influence of cephalometrics on orthodontic treatment planning.
Nijkamp PG; Habets LL; Aartman IH; Zentner A
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):630-5. PubMed ID: 18981169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How important are lateral cephalometric radiographs in orthodontic treatment planning?
Devereux L; Moles D; Cunningham SJ; McKnight M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):e175-81. PubMed ID: 21300228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of lateral cephalometric radiography in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
Durão AR; Alqerban A; Ferreira AP; Jacobs R
Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):206-10. PubMed ID: 25191839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnosis and treatment planning of orthodontic patients with 3-dimensional dentofacial records.
Manosudprasit A; Haghi A; Allareddy V; Masoud MI
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jun; 151(6):1083-1091. PubMed ID: 28554454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variations in orthodontic treatment planning decisions of Class II patients between virtual 3-dimensional models and traditional plaster study models.
Whetten JL; Williamson PC; Heo G; Varnhagen C; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):485-91. PubMed ID: 17045148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Orthodontists' perceptions of the impact of phase 1 treatment for Class II malocclusion on phase 2 needs.
King GJ; Wheeler TT; McGorray SP; Aiosa LS; Bloom RM; Taylor MG
J Dent Res; 1999 Nov; 78(11):1745-53. PubMed ID: 10576171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Orthodontic treatment planning: do orthodontists treat to cephalometric norms?
Al-Balkhi KM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Nov; 4(4):12-27. PubMed ID: 14625592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. European Board of Orthodontics case report: malocclusion in adult patient.
Ronchin M
Prog Orthod; 2006; 7(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 16552459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion.
de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Almeida MR; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):833-42. PubMed ID: 19962606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Orthodontic treatment of a Class II/1 malocclusion with extremely enlarged overjet.
Cudovic B
J Orofac Orthop; 1998; 59(6):388-93. PubMed ID: 9857607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Consistency of orthodontic treatment planning decisions.
Lee R; MacFarlane T; O'Brien K
Clin Orthod Res; 1999 May; 2(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 10534983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A controlled clinical trial of the effects of the Twin Block and Dynamax appliances on the hard and soft tissues.
Lee RT; Kyi CS; Mack GJ
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Jun; 29(3):272-82. PubMed ID: 17456506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [A cephalometric appraisal of bite opening during Begg technique treatment].
Liang JX
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1993 Jul; 28(4):243-5. PubMed ID: 8174412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Change in the soft tissue profile during and after orthodontic treatment.
Akin N
J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1993 Sep; 1(4):347-53. PubMed ID: 9582639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Consistency of orthodontic extraction decisions.
Ribarevski R; Vig P; Vig KD; Weyant R; O'Brien K
Eur J Orthod; 1996 Feb; 18(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 8746179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in early and late adulthood. a prospective cephalometric study of consecutively treated subjects.
Ruf S; Pancherz H
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Aug; 28(4):352-60. PubMed ID: 16644850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment.
Lerstøl M; Torget O; Vandevska-Radunovic V
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 19477971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does articulating study casts make a difference to treatment planning?
Ellis PE; Benson PE
J Orthod; 2003 Mar; 30(1):45-9; discussion 22-3. PubMed ID: 12644607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiographic examinations of orthodontic educators and practitioners.
Atchison KA
J Dent Educ; 1986 Nov; 50(11):651-5. PubMed ID: 3464630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
