113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18982034)
1. Evaluation of the side effects and image quality during fluorescein angiography comparing 2 mL and 5 mL sodium fluorescein.
Moosbrugger KA; Sheidow TG
Can J Ophthalmol; 2008 Oct; 43(5):571-5. PubMed ID: 18982034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intravenous fluorescein angiography-associated adverse reactions.
Xu K; Tzankova V; Li C; Sharma S
Can J Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 51(5):321-325. PubMed ID: 27769320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nausea and fluourescein injection speed.
Bregu M; Tesha PE; Wong DT; Giavedoni LR; Altomare F; Yoganathan P; Chow DR; Romano MR
Ophthalmology; 2012 Jun; 119(6):1281-1281.e1. PubMed ID: 22656891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fluorescein angiography and adverse drug reactions revisited: the Lions Eye experience.
Kwan AS; Barry C; McAllister IL; Constable I
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2006; 34(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 16451256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Temperature effect on nausea during fluorescein angiography.
Lee LR; Hainsworth DP; Hamm CW; Madsen RW
Ophthalmology; 2001 Jul; 108(7):1193-5. PubMed ID: 11425674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy and safety of fluorescein angiography with orally administered sodium fluorescein.
Hara T; Inami M; Hara T
Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Oct; 126(4):560-4. PubMed ID: 9780101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adverse reaction in patients with drug allergy history after simultaneous intravenous fundus fluorescein angiography and indocyanine green angiography.
Su Z; Ye P; Teng Y; Zhang L; Shu X
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther; 2012 Aug; 28(4):410-3. PubMed ID: 22372690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Documentation of corneal epithelial defects with fluorescein-enhanced digital fundus camera photography.
Dean SJ; Novitskaya ES; Moore TC; Moore JE; Sharma A
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 36(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 18352866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anaphylaxis following intravenous fluorescein angiography in a vitreoretinal clinic: report of 4 cases.
Bearelly S; Rao S; Fekrat S
Can J Ophthalmol; 2009 Aug; 44(4):444-5. PubMed ID: 19606168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital fundus imaging: a comparison with photographic techniques.
Rapkin JS; Rapkin KM; Wilson GW
Ann Ophthalmol; 1991 Feb; 23(2):46-53. PubMed ID: 2029112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity of fluorexon disodium versus sodium fluorescein for use in Goldmann tonometry.
Ng LT; Tong JW; De Land PN
Cornea; 2006 Jul; 25(6):679-86. PubMed ID: 17077660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adverse reactions during retinal fluorescein angiography.
Jennings BJ; Mathews DE
J Am Optom Assoc; 1994 Jul; 65(7):465-71. PubMed ID: 7930354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Allergic reaction to fluorescein dye: successful one-day desensitization.
Knowles SR; Weber EA; Berbrayer CS
Can J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 42(2):329-30. PubMed ID: 17392867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fluorescein-induced Raynaud's phenomenon.
Blaise P; Ribbens C; Rakic JM
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Dec; 85(8):910-1. PubMed ID: 17608774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Anaphylaxis caused by intravenous fluorescein: clinical characteristics and review of literature.
Ha SO; Kim DY; Sohn CH; Lim KS
Intern Emerg Med; 2014 Apr; 9(3):325-30. PubMed ID: 24293212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of 'local contrast enhancement' for oral fluorescein angiograms.
Newsom RS; Sinthanayothin C; Boyce J; Casswell AG; Williamson TH
Eye (Lond); 2000 Jun; 14 ( Pt 3A)():318-23. PubMed ID: 11026992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oral fluorescein angiography with the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope.
Garcia CR; Rivero ME; Bartsch DU; Ishiko S; Takamiya A; Fukui K; Hirokawa H; Clark T; Yoshida A; Freeman WR
Ophthalmology; 1999 Jun; 106(6):1114-8. PubMed ID: 10366079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurements of linear dimensions on fundus photographs: comparison between photographic film and digital systems.
Musadiq M; Patsoura E; Hughes S; Yang YC
Eye (Lond); 2003 Jul; 17(5):619-22. PubMed ID: 12855971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Allergy skin testing in predicting adverse reactions to fluorescein: a prospective clinical study.
Kalogeromitros DC; Makris MP; Aggelides XS; Mellios AI; Giannoula FC; Sideri KA; Rouvas AA; Theodossiadis PG
Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Aug; 89(5):480-3. PubMed ID: 19906081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of oral fluorescein angiography using the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope and digital fundus camera with intravenous fluorescein angiography using the digital fundus camera.
Azad RV; Baishya B; Pal N; Sharma YR; Kumar A; Vohra R
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2006 Jul; 34(5):425-9. PubMed ID: 16872337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
