208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18982998)
41. Geogenic arsenic and other trace elements in the shallow hydrogeologic system of Southern Poopó Basin, Bolivian Altiplano.
Ormachea Muñoz M; Wern H; Johnsson F; Bhattacharya P; Sracek O; Thunvik R; Quintanilla J; Bundschuh J
J Hazard Mater; 2013 Nov; 262():924-40. PubMed ID: 24091126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Integrating NZVI and carbon substrates in a non-pumping reactive wells array for the remediation of a nitrate contaminated aquifer.
Hosseini SM; Tosco T
J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Aug; 179():182-95. PubMed ID: 26142547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Pollutant sources in an arsenic-affected multilayer aquifer in the Po Plain of Italy: Implications for drinking-water supply.
Rotiroti M; McArthur J; Fumagalli L; Stefania GA; Sacchi E; Bonomi T
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Feb; 578():502-512. PubMed ID: 27836337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Adsorption of arsenic from water and its recovery as a highly active photocatalyst.
Hott RC; Andrade TG; Santos MS; Lima AC; Faria MC; Bomfeti CA; Barbosa F; Maia LF; Oliveira LC; Pereira MC; Rodrigues JL
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Nov; 23(21):21969-21979. PubMed ID: 27539466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Mitigating arsenic crisis in the developing world: role of robust, reusable and selective hybrid anion exchanger (HAIX).
German M; Seingheng H; SenGupta AK
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Aug; 488-489():547-53. PubMed ID: 24321388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A randomised intervention trial to assess two arsenic mitigation options in Bangladesh.
Milton AH; Smith W; Dear K; Ng J; Sim M; Ranmuthugala G; Lokuge K; Caldwell B; Rahman A; Rahman H; Shraim A; Huang D; Shahidullah SM
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2007 Oct; 42(12):1897-908. PubMed ID: 17952791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Disposal of water treatment wastes containing arsenic - a review.
Sullivan C; Tyrer M; Cheeseman CR; Graham NJ
Sci Total Environ; 2010 Mar; 408(8):1770-8. PubMed ID: 20153878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Pump-and-treat (P&T) vs groundwater circulation wells (GCW): Which approach delivers more sustainable and effective groundwater remediation?
Ciampi P; Esposito C; Bartsch E; Alesi EJ; Petrangeli Papini M
Environ Res; 2023 Oct; 234():116538. PubMed ID: 37399987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Arsenic in groundwaters in the Northern Appalachian Mountain belt: a review of patterns and processes.
Peters SC
J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Jul; 99(1-4):8-21. PubMed ID: 18571283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Arsenic removal methods for drinking water in the developing countries: technological developments and research needs.
Kabir F; Chowdhury S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Nov; 24(31):24102-24120. PubMed ID: 28975542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Uranium in well drinking water of Kabul, Afghanistan and its effective, low-cost depuration using Mg-Fe based hydrotalcite-like compounds.
Kato M; Azimi MD; Fayaz SH; Shah MD; Hoque MZ; Hamajima N; Ohnuma S; Ohtsuka T; Maeda M; Yoshinaga M
Chemosphere; 2016 Dec; 165():27-32. PubMed ID: 27619645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Does ochre have the potential to be a remedial treatment for As-contaminated soils?
Olimah JA; Shaw LJ; Hodson ME
Environ Pollut; 2015 Nov; 206():150-8. PubMed ID: 26162334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Exploring the arsenic removal potential of various biosorbents from water.
Shakoor MB; Niazi NK; Bibi I; Shahid M; Saqib ZA; Nawaz MF; Shaheen SM; Wang H; Tsang DCW; Bundschuh J; Ok YS; Rinklebe J
Environ Int; 2019 Feb; 123():567-579. PubMed ID: 30622081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Emerging technologies for arsenic removal from drinking water in rural and peri-urban areas: Methods, experience from, and options for Latin America.
Kumar R; Patel M; Singh P; Bundschuh J; Pittman CU; Trakal L; Mohan D
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Dec; 694():133427. PubMed ID: 31756815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Arsenic removal by perilla leaf biochar in aqueous solutions and groundwater: An integrated spectroscopic and microscopic examination.
Niazi NK; Bibi I; Shahid M; Ok YS; Burton ED; Wang H; Shaheen SM; Rinklebe J; Lüttge A
Environ Pollut; 2018 Jan; 232():31-41. PubMed ID: 28966026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents--A critical review.
Mohan D; Pittman CU
J Hazard Mater; 2007 Apr; 142(1-2):1-53. PubMed ID: 17324507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. One solution to the arsenic problem: a return to surface (improved dug) wells.
Joya SA; Mostofa G; Yousuf J; Islam A; Elahi A; Mahiuddin G; Rahman M; Quamruzzaman Q; Wilson R
J Health Popul Nutr; 2006 Sep; 24(3):363-75. PubMed ID: 17366778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Investigation on the long-term storage and fate of arsenic obtained as a treatment residual: a case study.
Ghosh D; Sarkar S; Sengupta AK; Gupta A
J Hazard Mater; 2014 Apr; 271():302-10. PubMed ID: 24641993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Advanced application of nano-technological and biological processes as well as mitigation options for arsenic removal.
Maity JP; Chen CY; Bhattacharya P; Sharma RK; Ahmad A; Patnaik S; Bundschuh J
J Hazard Mater; 2021 Mar; 405():123885. PubMed ID: 33183836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Subsurface iron and arsenic removal for shallow tube well drinking water supply in rural Bangladesh.
van Halem D; Olivero S; de Vet WW; Verberk JQ; Amy GL; van Dijk JC
Water Res; 2010 Nov; 44(19):5761-9. PubMed ID: 20573366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
