171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18983143)
1. Practical outcomes of applying ensemble machine learning classifiers to High-Throughput Screening (HTS) data analysis and screening.
Simmons K; Kinney J; Owens A; Kleier DA; Bloch K; Argentar D; Walsh A; Vaidyanathan G
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Nov; 48(11):2196-206. PubMed ID: 18983143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative study of machine-learning and chemometric tools for analysis of in-vivo high-throughput screening data.
Simmons K; Kinney J; Owens A; Kleier D; Bloch K; Argentar D; Walsh A; Vaidyanathan G
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1663-8. PubMed ID: 18681397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Novel statistical approach for primary high-throughput screening hit selection.
Yan SF; Asatryan H; Li J; Zhou Y
J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(6):1784-90. PubMed ID: 16309285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Novel trends in high-throughput screening.
Mayr LM; Bojanic D
Curr Opin Pharmacol; 2009 Oct; 9(5):580-8. PubMed ID: 19775937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Identifying actives from HTS data sets: practical approaches for the selection of an appropriate HTS data-processing method and quality control review.
Shun TY; Lazo JS; Sharlow ER; Johnston PA
J Biomol Screen; 2011 Jan; 16(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 21160066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Machine learning in sedimentation modelling.
Bhattacharya B; Solomatine DP
Neural Netw; 2006 Mar; 19(2):208-14. PubMed ID: 16530383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting human liver microsomal stability with machine learning techniques.
Sakiyama Y; Yuki H; Moriya T; Hattori K; Suzuki M; Shimada K; Honma T
J Mol Graph Model; 2008 Feb; 26(6):907-15. PubMed ID: 17683964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Machine learning models for lipophilicity and their domain of applicability.
Schroeter T; Schwaighofer A; Mika S; Laak AT; Suelzle D; Ganzer U; Heinrich N; Müller KR
Mol Pharm; 2007; 4(4):524-38. PubMed ID: 17637064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selection and combination of machine learning classifiers for prediction of linear B-cell epitopes on proteins.
Söllner J
J Mol Recognit; 2006; 19(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 16602136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Machine learning in soil classification.
Bhattacharya B; Solomatine DP
Neural Netw; 2006 Mar; 19(2):186-95. PubMed ID: 16530382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contemporary QSAR classifiers compared.
Bruce CL; Melville JL; Pickett SD; Hirst JD
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 17238267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. GPU accelerated support vector machines for mining high-throughput screening data.
Liao Q; Wang J; Webster Y; Watson IA
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Dec; 49(12):2718-25. PubMed ID: 19961205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Supervised learning with decision tree-based methods in computational and systems biology.
Geurts P; Irrthum A; Wehenkel L
Mol Biosyst; 2009 Dec; 5(12):1593-605. PubMed ID: 20023720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chemogenomic analysis of safety profiling data.
Scheiber J; Jenkins JL
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 575():207-23. PubMed ID: 19727617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of diversity-based, high-throughput screening on drug discovery: "chance favours the prepared mind".
Snowden M; Green DV
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2008 Jul; 11(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 18600571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Targets looking for drugs: a multistep computational protocol for the development of structure-based pharmacophores and their applications for hit discovery.
Tintori C; Corradi V; Magnani M; Manetti F; Botta M
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Nov; 48(11):2166-79. PubMed ID: 18942779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Classification of highly unbalanced CYP450 data of drugs using cost sensitive machine learning techniques.
Eitrich T; Kless A; Druska C; Meyer W; Grotendorst J
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):92-103. PubMed ID: 17238253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of antibacterial compounds by machine learning approaches.
Yang XG; Chen D; Wang M; Xue Y; Chen YZ
J Comput Chem; 2009 Jun; 30(8):1202-11. PubMed ID: 18988254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of recursion forests in the sequential screening process: consensus selection by multiple recursion trees.
van Rhee AM
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(3):941-8. PubMed ID: 12767153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ranking chemical structures for drug discovery: a new machine learning approach.
Agarwal S; Dugar D; Sengupta S
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 May; 50(5):716-31. PubMed ID: 20387860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
