171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18983143)
21. New methods for ligand-based virtual screening: use of data fusion and machine learning to enhance the effectiveness of similarity searching.
Hert J; Willett P; Wilton DJ; Acklin P; Azzaoui K; Jacoby E; Schuffenhauer A
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 16562973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An empirical process for the design of high-throughput screening deck filters.
Pearce BC; Sofia MJ; Good AC; Drexler DM; Stock DA
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(3):1060-8. PubMed ID: 16711725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ensemble stump classifiers and gene expression signatures in lung cancer.
Frey L; Edgerton M; Fisher D; Levy S
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 2):1255-9. PubMed ID: 17911916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Which aspects of HTS are empirically correlated with downstream success?
Bender A; Bojanic D; Davies JW; Crisman TJ; Mikhailov D; Scheiber J; Jenkins JL; Deng Z; Hill WA; Popov M; Jacoby E; Glick M
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2008 May; 11(3):327-37. PubMed ID: 18428086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A novel in silico approach to drug discovery via computational intelligence.
Hecht D; Fogel GB
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1105-21. PubMed ID: 19348414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Use of mixture distributions to deconvolute the behavior of "hits" and controls in high-throughput screening data.
Buxser S; Chapman DL
Anal Biochem; 2007 Feb; 361(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 17214952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Application of boosting-based decision tree ensemble classifiers for discrimination of thermophilic and mesophilic proteins].
Zhang GY; Fang BS
Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2006 Nov; 22(6):1026-31. PubMed ID: 17168331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Improved statistical methods for hit selection in high-throughput screening.
Brideau C; Gunter B; Pikounis B; Liaw A
J Biomol Screen; 2003 Dec; 8(6):634-47. PubMed ID: 14711389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Using information from historical high-throughput screens to predict active compounds.
Riniker S; Wang Y; Jenkins JL; Landrum GA
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jul; 54(7):1880-91. PubMed ID: 24933016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Medicinal chemistry tools: making sense of HTS data.
Kolossov E; Lemon A
Eur J Med Chem; 2006 Feb; 41(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 16368163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Alternative statistical parameter for high-throughput screening assay quality assessment.
Sui Y; Wu Z
J Biomol Screen; 2007 Mar; 12(2):229-34. PubMed ID: 17218666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Micro- and nanofluidic systems for high-throughput biological screening.
Hong J; Edel JB; deMello AJ
Drug Discov Today; 2009 Feb; 14(3-4):134-46. PubMed ID: 18983933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Machine learning improves the precision and robustness of high-content screens: using nonlinear multiparametric methods to analyze screening results.
Horvath P; Wild T; Kutay U; Csucs G
J Biomol Screen; 2011 Oct; 16(9):1059-67. PubMed ID: 21807964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Using clustering techniques to improve hit selection in high-throughput screening.
Gagarin A; Makarenkov V; Zentilli P
J Biomol Screen; 2006 Dec; 11(8):903-14. PubMed ID: 17092911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Bayesian model averaging for ligand discovery.
Angelopoulos N; Hadjiprocopis A; Walkinshaw MD
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1547-57. PubMed ID: 19489531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Statistics and decision making in high-throughput screening.
Coma I; Herranz J; Martin J
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 565():69-106. PubMed ID: 19551358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prediction of protein-protein interaction inhibitors by chemoinformatics and machine learning methods.
Neugebauer A; Hartmann RW; Klein CD
J Med Chem; 2007 Sep; 50(19):4665-8. PubMed ID: 17705363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Statistical instance-based pruning in ensembles of independent classifiers.
Hernández-Lobato D; Martínez-Muñoz G; Suárez A
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2009 Feb; 31(2):364-9. PubMed ID: 19110500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Hypothesis-driven screening.
Schopfer U; Engeloch C; Höhn F; Mees H; Leeds J; Glickman F; Scheel G; Ferrand S; Fekkes P; Pfeifer M
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 575():297-316. PubMed ID: 19727621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mechanism-based inhibition of cytochrome P450 enzymes: an evaluation of early decision making in vitro approaches and drug-drug interaction prediction methods.
Grime KH; Bird J; Ferguson D; Riley RJ
Eur J Pharm Sci; 2009 Feb; 36(2-3):175-91. PubMed ID: 19013237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
