227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18983317)
1. Influence of microgap location and configuration on the periimplant bone morphology in submerged implants. An experimental study in dogs.
Weng D; Nagata MJ; Bell M; Bosco AF; de Melo LG; Richter EJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1141-7. PubMed ID: 18983317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of microgap location and configuration on radiographic bone loss in nonsubmerged implants: an experimental study in dogs.
Weng D; Nagata MJ; Leite CM; de Melo LG; Bosco AF
Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(5):445-52. PubMed ID: 21909485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of microgap location and configuration on radiographic bone loss around submerged implants: an experimental study in dogs.
Weng D; Nagata MJ; Bosco AF; de Melo LG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):941-6. PubMed ID: 22010074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of microgap location and configuration on peri-implant bone morphology in nonsubmerged implants: an experimental study in dogs.
Weng D; Nagata MJ; Bell M; de Melo LG; Bosco AF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):540-7. PubMed ID: 20556253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of interimplant distances and placement depth on peri-implant bone remodeling of adjacent and immediately loaded Morse cone connection implants: a histomorphometric study in dogs.
Barros RR; Novaes AB; Muglia VA; Iezzi G; Piattelli A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Apr; 21(4):371-8. PubMed ID: 20128832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Equicrestal and subcrestal dental implants: a histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of nine retrieved human implants.
Degidi M; Perrotti V; Shibli JA; Novaes AB; Piattelli A; Iezzi G
J Periodontol; 2011 May; 82(5):708-15. PubMed ID: 21138355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible.
Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Schenk RK; Buser D; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1372-83. PubMed ID: 11699479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible.
Hermann JS; Buser D; Schenk RK; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2000 Sep; 71(9):1412-24. PubMed ID: 11022770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone response to loaded implants with non-matching implant-abutment diameters in the canine mandible.
Cochran DL; Bosshardt DD; Grize L; Higginbottom FL; Jones AA; Jung RE; Wieland M; Dard M
J Periodontol; 2009 Apr; 80(4):609-17. PubMed ID: 19335081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of the microgap in the peri-implant hard and soft tissues: a histomorphometric study in dogs.
Todescan FF; Pustiglioni FE; Imbronito AV; Albrektsson T; Gioso M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):467-72. PubMed ID: 12182289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible.
King GN; Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Buser D; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2002 Oct; 73(10):1111-7. PubMed ID: 12416767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog.
Botticelli D; Berglundh T; Persson LG; Lindhe J
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):448-55. PubMed ID: 15842258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subcrestal placement of two-part implants.
Welander M; Abrahamsson I; Berglundh T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 19397633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Crestal bone loss related to immediate implants in crestal and subcrestal position: a pilot study in dogs.
Calvo-Guirado JL; López-López PJ; Mate Sanchez JE; Gargallo Albiol J; Velasco Ortega E; Delgado Ruiz R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Nov; 25(11):1286-1294. PubMed ID: 24118345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effects of Subcrestal Implant Placement on Crestal Bone Levels and Bone-to-Abutment Contact: A Microcomputed Tomographic and Histologic Study in Dogs.
Fetner M; Fetner A; Koutouzis T; Clozza E; Tovar N; Sarendranath A; Coelho PG; Neiva K; Janal MN; Neiva R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1068-75. PubMed ID: 26394343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of subcrestal implant placement compared with equicrestal position on the peri-implant hard and soft tissues around platform-switched implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Valles C; Rodríguez-Ciurana X; Clementini M; Baglivo M; Paniagua B; Nart J
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):555-570. PubMed ID: 29313133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. "Biologic width"and crestal bone remodeling with sintered porous-surfaced dental implants: a study in dogs.
Deporter D; Al-Sayyed A; Pilliar RM; Valiquette N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 18700381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of placement depth on bone remodeling around tapered internal connection implants: a histologic study in dogs.
Huang B; Meng H; Zhu W; Witek L; Tovar N; Coelho PG
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Aug; 26(8):942-949. PubMed ID: 24720447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of non-matching implant and abutment diameters on radiographic crestal bone levels in dogs.
Jung RE; Jones AA; Higginbottom FL; Wilson TG; Schoolfield J; Buser D; Hämmerle CH; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2008 Feb; 79(2):260-70. PubMed ID: 18251640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted, large-grit and acid-etched implant surfaces at sites with coronal circumferential defects: an experimental study in dogs.
Lai HC; Zhuang LF; Zhang ZY; Wieland M; Liu X
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 19397636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
