219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18983419)
1. Doing accountability: a discourse analysis of research ethics committee letters.
O'Reilly M; Dixon-Woods M; Angell E; Ashcroft R; Bryman A
Sociol Health Illn; 2009 Mar; 31(2):246-61. PubMed ID: 18983419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Written work: the social functions of Research Ethics Committee letters.
Dixon-Woods M; Angell E; Ashcroft RE; Bryman A
Soc Sci Med; 2007 Aug; 65(4):792-802. PubMed ID: 17490795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?
Angell E; Dixon-Woods M
J Med Ethics; 2009 Feb; 35(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 19181888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An analysis of decision letters by research ethics committees: the ethics/scientific quality boundary examined.
Angell EL; Bryman A; Ashcroft RE; Dixon-Woods M
Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Apr; 17(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 18385408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Research involving storage and use of human tissue: how did the Human Tissue Act 2004 affect decisions by research ethics committees?
Angell E; Tarrant C; Dixon-Woods M
J Clin Pathol; 2009 Sep; 62(9):825-9. PubMed ID: 19734481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Law, ethics and research ethics committees.
Beyleveld D
Med Law; 2002; 21(1):57-75. PubMed ID: 12017445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can an ethics officer role reduce delays in research ethics approval? A mixed-method evaluation of an improvement project.
Dixon-Woods M; Foy C; Hayden C; Al-Shahi Salman R; Tebbutt S; Schroter S
BMJ Open; 2016 Aug; 6(8):e011973. PubMed ID: 27580832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Decisions by Finnish Medical Research Ethics Committees: A Nationwide Study of Process and Outcomes.
Hemminki E; Virtanen JI; Regushevskaya E
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Oct; 10(4):404-13. PubMed ID: 26333684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Research Ethics Committees' Oversight of Biomedical Research in South Africa: A Thematic Analysis of Ethical Issues Raised During Ethics Review of Non-Expedited Protocols.
Silaigwana B; Wassenaar D
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Apr; 14(2):107-116. PubMed ID: 30678521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Call for Better, Not Faster, Research Ethics Committee Reviews in the Covid-19 Era.
Tamariz L; Hendler FJ; Wells JM; Anderson A; Bartlett S
Ethics Hum Res; 2021 Sep; 43(5):42-44. PubMed ID: 34496160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Should research ethics committees meet in public?
Sheehan M
J Med Ethics; 2008 Aug; 34(8):631-5. PubMed ID: 18667656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reviewing the reviewers: the vague accountability of research ethics committees.
Shaul R
Crit Care; 2002 Apr; 6(2):121-2. PubMed ID: 11983036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What do research ethics committees say about applications to conduct research involving children?
Angell E; Biggs H; Gahleitner F; Dixon-Woods M
Arch Dis Child; 2010 Nov; 95(11):915-7. PubMed ID: 20573742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lay REC members: patient or public?
Staley K
J Med Ethics; 2013 Dec; 39(12):780-2. PubMed ID: 23536688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Research ethics review--protecting participants in research.
Dhai A
S Afr Med J; 2005 Aug; 95(8):595-7. PubMed ID: 16201003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Case-Study of the Resources and Functioning of Two Research Ethics Committees in Western India.
Chenneville T; Menezes L; Kosambiya J; Baxi R
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Dec; 11(5):387-396. PubMed ID: 26994735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomedical Research Ethics Committees in sub-Saharan Africa: a collective review of their structure, functioning, and outcomes.
Silaigwana B; Wassenaar D
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Apr; 10(2):169-84. PubMed ID: 25819759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Confidence of IRB/REC Members in Their Assessments of Human Research Risk: A Study of IRB/REC Decision Making in Action.
Grinnell F; Sadler JZ; McNamara V; Senetar K; Reisch J
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Jul; 12(3):140-149. PubMed ID: 28558484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Justification and authority in institutional review board decision letters.
Clapp JT; Gleason KA; Joffe S
Soc Sci Med; 2017 Dec; 194():25-33. PubMed ID: 29059597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Training needs assessment in research ethics evaluation among research ethics committee members in three African countries: Cameroon, Mali and Tanzania.
Ateudjieu J; Williams J; Hirtle M; Baume C; Ikingura J; Niaré A; Sprumont D
Dev World Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(2):88-98. PubMed ID: 19912281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
