These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18983597)

  • 1. A revealed preference approach to estimating supply curves for ecosystem services: use of auctions to set payments for soil erosion control in Indonesia.
    Jack BK; Leimona B; Ferraro PJ
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):359-67. PubMed ID: 18983597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using cost-effective targeting to enhance the efficiency of conservation investments in payments for ecosystem services.
    Chen X; Lupi F; Viña A; He G; Liu J
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Dec; 24(6):1469-78. PubMed ID: 20586786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Designing cost-effective payments for conservation measures to generate spatiotemporal habitat heterogeneity.
    Drechsler M; Johst K; Ohl C; Wätzold F
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1475-86. PubMed ID: 18173471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safeguarding biodiversity and ecosystem services in the Little Karoo, South Africa.
    Egoh BN; Reyers B; Carwardine J; Bode M; O'Farrell PJ; Wilson KA; Possingham HP; Rouget M; de Lange W; Richardson DM; Cowling RM
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):1021-30. PubMed ID: 20136871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Costa Rica's payment for environmental services program: intention, implementation, and impact.
    Sánchez-Azofeifa GA; Pfaff A; Robalino JA; Boomhower JP
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Oct; 21(5):1165-73. PubMed ID: 17883482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of prices in conserving critical natural capital.
    Farley J
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1399-408. PubMed ID: 19076873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ecological economics of soil erosion: a review of the current state of knowledge.
    Adhikari B; Nadella K
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2011 Feb; 1219():134-52. PubMed ID: 21332496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A landholder-based approach to the design of private-land conservation programs.
    Moon K; Cocklin C
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Jun; 25(3):493-503. PubMed ID: 21309851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The cost of policy simplification in conservation incentive programs.
    Armsworth PR; Acs S; Dallimer M; Gaston KJ; Hanley N; Wilson P
    Ecol Lett; 2012 May; 15(5):406-14. PubMed ID: 22385501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phase-in of nonpoint sources in a transferable discharge permit system for water quality management: setting permit prices.
    Collentine D
    Ambio; 2005 Nov; 34(7):573-8. PubMed ID: 16435748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Costs of integrating economics and conservation planning.
    Arponen A; Cabeza M; Eklund J; Kujala H; Lehtomäki J
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1198-204. PubMed ID: 20575989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficiency and concordance of alternative methods for minimizing opportunity costs in conservation planning.
    Cameron SE; Williams KJ; Mitchell DK
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug; 22(4):886-96. PubMed ID: 18637906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Environmental service payments: evaluating biodiversity conservation trade-offs and cost-efficiency in the Osa Conservation Area, Costa Rica.
    Barton DN; Faith DP; Rusch GM; Acevedo H; Paniagua L; Castro M
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Feb; 90(2):901-11. PubMed ID: 18423841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation.
    Wunder S
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Feb; 21(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 17298510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating the impacts of conservation on ecosystem services and poverty by integrating modeling and evaluation.
    Ferraro PJ; Hanauer MM; Miteva DA; Nelson JL; Pattanayak SK; Nolte C; Sims KR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jun; 112(24):7420-5. PubMed ID: 26082549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural-resource management.
    Tallis H; Polasky S
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Apr; 1162():265-83. PubMed ID: 19432652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ecosystem services provided by bats.
    Kunz TH; Braun de Torrez E; Bauer D; Lobova T; Fleming TH
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2011 Mar; 1223():1-38. PubMed ID: 21449963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combining auctions and performance-based payments in a forest enrichment field trial in Western Kenya.
    Khalumba M; Wünscher T; Wunder S; Büdenbender M; Holm-Müller K
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Jun; 28(3):861-6. PubMed ID: 24665907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prioritizing conservation effort through the use of biological soil crusts as ecosystem function indicators in an arid region.
    Bowker MA; Miller ME; Belnap J; Sisk TD; Johnson NC
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1533-43. PubMed ID: 18759770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple benefits of carbon-friendly agricultural practices: empirical assessment of conservation tillage.
    Kurkalova L; Kling CL; Zhao J
    Environ Manage; 2004 Apr; 33(4):519-27. PubMed ID: 15453405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.