146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18983633)
1. Reliability and repeatability of the Pentacam on corneal curvatures.
Chen D; Lam AK
Clin Exp Optom; 2009 Mar; 92(2):110-8. PubMed ID: 18983633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Anterior segment biometry with the Pentacam: comprehensive assessment of repeatability of automated measurements.
Shankar H; Taranath D; Santhirathelagan CT; Pesudovs K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jan; 34(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 18165089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intrasession and intersession repeatability of the Pentacam system on posterior corneal assessment in the normal human eye.
Chen D; Lam AK
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Mar; 33(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 17321396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Repeatability and reproducibility of posterior corneal curvature measurements by combined scanning-slit and placido-disc topography after LASIK.
Maldonado MJ; Nieto JC; Díez-Cuenca M; Piñero DP
Ophthalmology; 2006 Nov; 113(11):1918-26. PubMed ID: 16935339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of corneal power measurements obtained with a new corneal topographer.
Mao X; Savini G; Zhuo Z; Feng Y; Zhang J; Wang Q; Chen H; Huang J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1561-9. PubMed ID: 23860010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of reliability and repeatability of corneal curvature assessment with six keratometers.
Hamer CA; Buckhurst H; Purslow C; Shum GL; Habib NE; Buckhurst PJ
Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Nov; 99(6):583-589. PubMed ID: 27397501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Precision and agreement of corneal power measurements obtained using a new corneal topographer OphthaTOP.
Huang J; Savini G; Chen H; Bao F; Li Y; Chen H; Lu W; Yu Y; Wang Q
PLoS One; 2015; 10(1):e109414. PubMed ID: 25559203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeatability of corneal first-surface wavefront aberrations measured with Pentacam corneal topography.
Shankar H; Taranath D; Santhirathelagan CT; Pesudovs K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 May; 34(5):727-34. PubMed ID: 18471625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeatability of corneal thickness measured using an Oculus Pentacam.
Miranda MA; Radhakrishnan H; O'Donnell C
Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 19214132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repeatability, reliability and reproducibility of posterior curvature and wavefront aberrations in keratoconic and cross-linked corneas.
Sideroudi H; Labiris G; Giarmoulakis A; Bougatsou N; Mikropoulos D; Kozobolis V
Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Nov; 96(6):547-56. PubMed ID: 23614387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comprehensive evaluation of the precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of the Oculus Pentacam HR.
McAlinden C; Khadka J; Pesudovs K
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7731-7. PubMed ID: 21810981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pentacam pachometry: comparison with non-contact specular microscopy on the central cornea and inter-session repeatability on the peripheral cornea.
Lam A; Chen D
Clin Exp Optom; 2007 Mar; 90(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 17311572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeatability of aberrometric measurements in normal and keratoconus eyes using a new Scheimpflug-Placido topographer.
Bayhan HA; Aslan Bayhan S; Muhafız E; Can I
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Feb; 40(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 24368115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intrasubject repeatability in keratoconus-eye measurements obtained with a new Scheimpflug photography-based system.
Montalbán R; Alió JL; Javaloy J; Piñero DP
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Feb; 39(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 23218818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The repeatability of corneal and corneal epithelial thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography.
Sin S; Simpson TL
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Jun; 83(6):360-5. PubMed ID: 16772894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Precision (Repeatability and Reproducibility) and Agreement of Corneal Power Measurements Obtained by Topcon KR-1W and iTrace.
Hua Y; Xu Z; Qiu W; Wu Q
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0147086. PubMed ID: 26752059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Keratometry evaluations with the Pentacam high resolution in comparison with the automated keratometry and conventional corneal topography.
Módis L; Szalai E; Kolozsvári B; Németh G; Vajas A; Berta A
Cornea; 2012 Jan; 31(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22081146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparability and repeatability of corneal astigmatism measurements using different measurement technologies.
Visser N; Berendschot TT; Verbakel F; de Brabander J; Nuijts RM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1764-70. PubMed ID: 22999600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Repeatability of whole-cornea measurements using an anterior segment imaging device based on OCT and Placido-disk.
Martínez-Albert N; Esteve-Taboada JJ; Montés-Micó R
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2017 Feb; 14(2):169-175. PubMed ID: 28097917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comprehensive assessment of the precision and agreement of anterior corneal power measurements obtained using 8 different devices.
Wang Q; Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Xu Z; Feng Y; Wen D; Hua Y; Yang F; Pan C; Huang J
PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45607. PubMed ID: 23049823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
