BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1779 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18984124)

  • 41. Long-term survival of the T-28 versus the TR-28 cemented total hip arthroplasties.
    Meding JB; Nassif JM; Ritter MA
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Oct; 15(7):928-33. PubMed ID: 11061455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Long-term survivorship of cemented all-polyethylene acetabular components in patients > 75 years of age.
    Levy BA; Berry DJ; Pagnano MW
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):461-7. PubMed ID: 10884206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Relationship of acetabular wear to osteolysis and loosening in total hip arthroplasty.
    Sochart DH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Jun; (363):135-50. PubMed ID: 10379315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The use of modularity in revision total hip replacement.
    Jones DL; Vigna F; Barrack RL
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2001 Apr; 30(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 11334451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A second-generation cementless total hip arthroplasty mean 9-year results.
    Surdam JW; Archibeck MJ; Schultz SC; Junick DW; White RE
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Feb; 22(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 17275634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Changing indications for revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
    J Surg Orthop Adv; 2005; 14(2):82-4. PubMed ID: 16115433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Tapered titanium cementless total hip replacements: a 10- to 13-year followup study.
    Bourne RB; Rorabeck CH; Patterson JJ; Guerin J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2001 Dec; (393):112-20. PubMed ID: 11764339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Total hip arthroplasty with cement and use of a collared matte-finish femoral component: nineteen to twenty-year follow-up.
    Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Firestone DE; Yehyawi TM; Goetz DD; Sullivan J; Vittetoe DA; O'Rourke MR; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Feb; 90(2):299-306. PubMed ID: 18245589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The effect of middle-age body weight and physical activity on the risk of early revision hip arthroplasty: a cohort study of 1,535 individuals.
    Flugsrud GB; Nordsletten L; Espehaug B; Havelin LI; Meyer HE
    Acta Orthop; 2007 Feb; 78(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 17453400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The Exeter Universal stem: a minimum ten-year review from an independent centre.
    Hook S; Moulder E; Yates PJ; Burston BJ; Whitley E; Bannister GC
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Dec; 88(12):1584-90. PubMed ID: 17159168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Ten-year experience with the Aldinger custom-made total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of the results].
    Masár J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Jun; 74(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 17623605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Fifteen years follow-up of hip arthroplasties with a cemented monoblock femoral stem and a flanged acetabular component.
    Mulier M; Eslami A
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2005 Apr; 71(2):177-81. PubMed ID: 16152851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The use of a hydroxyapatite-coated primary stem in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Kelly SJ; Incavo SJ; Beynnon B
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jan; 21(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 16446187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Bousquet's device in the treatment of recurrent dislocation of a total hip prosthesis. Apropos of 13 cases].
    Leclercq S; el Blidi S; Aubriot JH
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1995; 81(5):389-94. PubMed ID: 8560007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years.
    Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Feb; 76(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 15788305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Is cemented metal-polyethylene 22.2mm hip arthroplasty a gold standard? Results of a series of 105 primary arthroplasties at a minimum of ten years follow-up.
    Mesnil P; Vasseur L; Wavreille G; Fontaine C; Duquennoy A; Migaud H
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2014 Jun; 100(4):369-73. PubMed ID: 24768433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Surgical therapy of osteolysis around stable cementless hip arthroplasty].
    Spicka J; Gallo J; Cechová I; Kamínek P; Mikulík J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2005; 72(4):228-34. PubMed ID: 16194441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Review and analysis of revision of total hip replacement].
    Sun J; Du J; Lei L; Zhang Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 18(5):380-2. PubMed ID: 15460049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Single-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty in patients less than 35 years. Forty arthroplasties with 5-17 years follow-up.
    Simon JP; Robbens E; Maes M; Bellemans J
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2009 Apr; 75(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 19492558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
    Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 89.