155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18984239)
21. Functional radiographic analysis of thoracic spine extension motion in asymptomatic men.
Edmondston SJ; Christensen MM; Keller S; Steigen LB; Barclay L
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2012; 35(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 22386914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Thoracic segmental flexion during cervical forward bending.
Fiebert IM; Spyropoulos T; Peterman D; Dotson L
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 1993 Jan; 3(4):80-5. PubMed ID: 24573143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reliability of inclinometer and goniometric measurements of hip extension flexibility using the modified Thomas test.
Clapis PA; Davis SM; Davis RO
Physiother Theory Pract; 2008; 24(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18432516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reliability of the American Medical Association guides' model for measuring spinal range of motion. Its implication for whole-person impairment rating.
Nitschke JE; Nattrass CL; Disler PB; Chou MJ; Ooi KT
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb; 24(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 10025021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accuracy of a Radiological Evaluation Method for Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Curvatures Using Spinous Processes.
Marchetti BV; Candotti CT; Raupp EG; Oliveira EBC; Furlanetto TS; Loss JF
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2017; 40(9):700-707. PubMed ID: 29229061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The reliability and minimal detectable change of shoulder mobility measurements using a digital inclinometer.
Kolber MJ; Vega F; Widmayer K; Cheng MS
Physiother Theory Pract; 2011 Feb; 27(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 20690872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Validation of a method to assess range of motion of the cervical spine using a tape measure.
Asha SE; Pryor R
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2013 Oct; 36(8):538-45. PubMed ID: 24029386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Intrarater and interrater reliability of select clinical tests in patients referred for diagnostic facet joint blocks in the cervical spine.
Schneider GM; Jull G; Thomas K; Smith A; Emery C; Faris P; Schneider K; Salo P
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 94(8):1628-34. PubMed ID: 23485344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Normal functional range of motion of the cervical spine during 15 activities of daily living.
Bible JE; Biswas D; Miller CP; Whang PG; Grauer JN
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Feb; 23(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 20051924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Reliability of an accelerometer-based system for quantifying multiregional spinal range of motion.
Alqhtani RS; Jones MD; Theobald PS; Williams JM
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2015 May; 38(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 25936464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Stability and intra-tester reliability of an in vivo measurement of thoracic axial rotation using an innovative methodology.
Heneghan NR; Hall A; Hollands M; Balanos GM
Man Ther; 2009 Aug; 14(4):452-5. PubMed ID: 19046655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of asymptomatic subjects' thoracolumbar range of motion using the OSI CA 6000 Spine Motion Analyzer.
Petersen CM; Johnson RD; Schuit D; Hayes KW
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1994 Oct; 20(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 7987381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy and reliability of three different techniques for manual goniometry for wrist motion: a cadaveric study.
Carter TI; Pansy B; Wolff AL; Hillstrom HJ; Backus SI; Lenhoff M; Wolfe SW
J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Oct; 34(8):1422-8. PubMed ID: 19703734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device.
Audette I; Dumas JP; Côté JN; De Serres SJ
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2010 May; 40(5):318-23. PubMed ID: 20436238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The reliability of quantifying upright standing postures as a baseline diagnostic clinical tool.
Dunk NM; Chung YY; Compton DS; Callaghan JP
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2004 Feb; 27(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 14970809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of determining radiographic sagittal parameters of the spine and pelvis using a manual and a computer-assisted methods.
Dimar JR; Carreon LY; Labelle H; Djurasovic M; Weidenbaum M; Brown C; Roussouly P
Eur Spine J; 2008 Oct; 17(10):1373-9. PubMed ID: 18726124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A quantitative and reproducible method to assess cord compression and canal stenosis after cervical spine trauma: a study of interrater and intrarater reliability.
Furlan JC; Fehlings MG; Massicotte EM; Aarabi B; Vaccaro AR; Bono CM; Madrazo I; Villanueva C; Grauer JN; Mikulis D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Sep; 32(19):2083-91. PubMed ID: 17762809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Concurrent validity and reliability of two-dimensional video analysis of hip and knee joint motion during mechanical lifting.
Norris BS; Olson SL
Physiother Theory Pract; 2011 Oct; 27(7):521-30. PubMed ID: 21568816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Knee range of motion: reliability and agreement of 3 measurement methods.
Peters PG; Herbenick MA; Anloague PA; Markert RJ; Rubino LJ
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2011 Dec; 40(12):E249-52. PubMed ID: 22268016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reliability of shoulder range of motion comparing a goniometer to a digital level.
Mullaney MJ; McHugh MP; Johnson CP; Tyler TF
Physiother Theory Pract; 2010 Jul; 26(5):327-33. PubMed ID: 20557263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
