These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18984302)

  • 41. [Guidelines for handling and assessment of renal biopsy specimens: Brief report from the committee for standardization of renal pathology diagnosis, JSN].
    Makino H; Shigematsu H; Joh K; Taguchi T; Saito T; Nishi S; Matsuo S; Yokoyama H; Hattori M; Honda M; Yoshikawa N
    Nihon Jinzo Gakkai Shi; 2004; 46(8):747-80. PubMed ID: 15645732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cytopathology in France.
    Cochand-Priollet B; Vincent S; Vielh P
    Cytopathology; 2004 Jun; 15(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 15165274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The role of Cytotechnologists in quality assurance and audit in non-gynaecological cytology.
    Wilson A
    Cytopathology; 2015 Apr; 26(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 25800805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Assessment of specimen fixation in a surgical pathology service.
    Start RD; Cross SS; Smith JH
    J Clin Pathol; 1992 Jun; 45(6):546-7. PubMed ID: 1306049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Critical value called, read-back obtained.
    Haverstick DM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2004 Jun; 121(6):790-1. PubMed ID: 15198348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The cancer and leukemia group B pathology committee at 50.
    Compton C
    Clin Cancer Res; 2006 Jun; 12(11 Pt 2):3617s-21s. PubMed ID: 16740795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A lost pathological specimen.
    Mein JN
    N Z Med J; 1995 Sep; 108(1007):370. PubMed ID: 7566780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Compliance with laboratory requirements regarding the secondary use of clinical specimens and laboratory data].
    Matsushita H; Miyachi H
    Rinsho Byori; 2009 Jul; 57(7):678-82. PubMed ID: 19708538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Analysis of clinico-pathological diagnostic discrepancies based on the autopsy data from the S.P. Botkin Hospital].
    Ledeneva OA
    Arkh Patol; 1988; 50(4):66-72. PubMed ID: 3408374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Risk management and compliance in pathology and laboratory medicine.
    Ahlin PA; Weiss RL
    Clin Lab Med; 2007 Dec; 27(4):859-73, vii. PubMed ID: 17950902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Something's lost, but something's gained: On-site evaluation, telecytology, and the cytopathologist.
    Gutmann EJ
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2019 Apr; 127(4):222-224. PubMed ID: 30821912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Overview of the cytology laboratory: specimen processing through diagnosis.
    Joste N
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 35(4):549-63; viii. PubMed ID: 19061816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Handling and pathology reporting of adrenal gland specimens.
    Scarpelli M; Algaba F; Kirkali Z; Van Poppel H; ;
    Eur Urol; 2004 Jun; 45(6):722-9. PubMed ID: 15149743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Using QRRO survey data to assess compliance with quality indicators for breast and prostate cancer.
    Owen JB; White JR; Zelefsky MJ; Wilson JF
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Jun; 6(6):442-7. PubMed ID: 19467491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Rules concerning the transport of diagnostic specimens by road. Working Group of the SFBC. Quality proceeding of the Quality Control section of the SFBC].
    Simonnet G
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2000; 58(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 10673624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [May histopathological grading of malignant tumors be better?].
    Sørensen FB
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Sep; 158(40):5591-4. PubMed ID: 8966785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Informatics tools for quality in anatomic pathology.
    Prichard JW; Strevig G; Brown AM; Wilkerson ML
    Clin Lab Med; 2008 Jun; 28(2):207-22, vi. PubMed ID: 18436067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Assessment of the quality of mini-HTA.
    Kidholm K; Ehlers L; Korsbek L; Kjaerby R; Beck M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jan; 25(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 19126250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Evaluation of the quality of hospital medical records in a hospital in Turin (Italy)].
    Gianino MM; Raciti IM; Galzerano M; Villata E; Fonte G; Rapellino M; Fiandra U
    Ig Sanita Pubbl; 2008; 64(6):719-34. PubMed ID: 19219084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. How to sample case management performance.
    Spath P
    Hosp Case Manag; 2002 Jun; 10(6):93-6. PubMed ID: 12038052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.