These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18984398)
1. Prediction of soft-tissue changes after mandibular advancement surgery with an equation developed with multivariable regression. Kneafsey LC; Cunningham SJ; Petrie A; Hutton TJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):657-64. PubMed ID: 18984398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stability of the hard and soft tissue profile after mandibular advancement in sagittal split osteotomies: a longitudinal and long-term follow-up study. Joss CU; Thüer UW Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 17962316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of a computer-based orthognathic surgery prediction system to postsurgical results. Gerbo LR; Poulton DR; Covell DA; Russell CA Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1997; 12(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 9456618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Soft tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with mandibular advancement osteotomy]. Athanasiou AE; Gjorup H; Toutountzakis N Hell Period Stomat Gnathopathoprosopike Cheir; 1990 Dec; 5(4):157-63. PubMed ID: 2130071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system. Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mandibular setback osteotomy: facial soft tissue behavior and possibility to improve the accuracy of the soft tissue profile prediction with the use of a computerized cephalometric program: Quick Ceph Image Pro: v. 2.5. Chunmaneechote P; Friede H Clin Orthod Res; 1999 May; 2(2):85-98. PubMed ID: 10534984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of lip response to orthodontic treatment using a multivariable regression model. Shirvani A; Sadeghian S; Abbasi S Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2016; 13(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 26962314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Soft tissue stability in segmental distraction of the anterior mandibular alveolar process. A 2-year follow-up. Joss CU; Triaca A; Antonini M; Kiliaridis S; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 41(5):560-5. PubMed ID: 22204924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the linearity of soft- to hard-tissue movement after orthognathic surgery. Chew MT; Sandham A; Wong HB Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):665-70. PubMed ID: 18984399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The validity of the prediction of Soft Tissue profile changes after LeFort I osteotomy using the dentofacial planner (computer software). Konstiantos KA; O'Reilly MT; Close J Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Mar; 105(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 8135206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical prediction of skeletal and soft tissue changes in treatment of Class II. de Lira Ade L; de Moura WL; Artese F; Bittencourt MA; Nojima LI J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 41(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 23201327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Soft tissue stability after segmental distraction of the anterior mandibular alveolar process: a 5.5 year follow-up. Joss CU; Triaca A; Antonini M; Kiliaridis S; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 42(3):345-51. PubMed ID: 23182400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subjective evaluation of profile prediction using video imaging. Giangreco TA; Forbes DP; Jacobson RS; Kallal RH; Moretti RJ; Marshall SD Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 9082009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Soft tissue changes of patients with skeletal class II malocclusion after orthodontic and surgical treatments]. Chen K; Zheng Y; Wang X Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Feb; 20(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 12593199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting lower lip and chin response to mandibular advancement and genioplasty. Veltkamp T; Buschang PH; English JD; Bates J; Schow SR Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Dec; 122(6):627-34. PubMed ID: 12490874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maintenance of soft tissue changes after rigid versus wire fixation for mandibular advancement, with and without genioplasty. Dolce C; Johnson PD; Van Sickels JE; Bays RA; Rugh JD Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Aug; 92(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 11505259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of two imaging programs in predicting the soft tissue changes with mandibular advancement surgery. Ravindranath S; Krishnaswamy NR; Sundaram V Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(4):354-65. PubMed ID: 22299108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Soft tissue profile changes following mandibular advancement surgery: predictability and long-term outcome. Mobarak KA; Espeland L; Krogstad O; Lyberg T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):353-67. PubMed ID: 11298309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Soft tissue changes after advancement genioplasty in Chinese adults]. Hu J; Wang DZ; Li SG Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1994 Jul; 29(4):201-3, 254. PubMed ID: 7859567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of cephalometric and video imaging program Dentofacial Planner Plus in orthognathic surgical planning. Schultes G; Gaggl A; Kärcher H Comput Aided Surg; 1998; 3(3):108-14. PubMed ID: 9888197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]