These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18984901)

  • 1. Choice of topology estimators in Bayesian phylogenetic analysis.
    Sukumaran J; Linkem CW
    Mol Biol Evol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 18984901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Topology-Bayes versus Clade-Bayes in phylogenetic analysis.
    Wheeler WC; Pickett KM
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Feb; 25(2):447-53. PubMed ID: 18079139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strange bayes indeed: uniform topological priors imply non-uniform clade priors.
    Pickett KM; Randle CP
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2005 Jan; 34(1):203-11. PubMed ID: 15579393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian hypothesis testing of four-taxon topologies using molecular sequence data.
    Sinsheimer JS; Lake JA; Little RJ
    Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):193-210. PubMed ID: 8934592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian support is larger than bootstrap support in phylogenetic inference: a mathematical argument.
    Britton T; Svennblad B; Erixon P; Oxelman B
    Math Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 24(4):401-11. PubMed ID: 17977880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of branch length uncertainty on Bayesian posterior probabilities for phylogenetic hypotheses.
    Kolaczkowski B; Thornton JW
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Sep; 24(9):2108-18. PubMed ID: 17636043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Branch-length prior influences Bayesian posterior probability of phylogeny.
    Yang Z; Rannala B
    Syst Biol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):455-70. PubMed ID: 16012111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling nucleotide evolution at the mesoscale: the phylogeny of the neotropical pitvipers of the Porthidium group (viperidae: crotalinae).
    Castoe TA; Sasa MM; Parkinson CL
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2005 Dec; 37(3):881-98. PubMed ID: 16024260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phylogenetic relationships and heterogeneous evolutionary processes among phrynosomatine sand lizards (Squamata, Iguanidae) revisited.
    Schulte JA; de Queiroz K
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2008 May; 47(2):700-16. PubMed ID: 18362078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does choice in model selection affect maximum likelihood analysis?
    Ripplinger J; Sullivan J
    Syst Biol; 2008 Feb; 57(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 18275003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using models of nucleotide evolution to build phylogenetic trees.
    Bos DH; Posada D
    Dev Comp Immunol; 2005; 29(3):211-27. PubMed ID: 15572070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Guided tree topology proposals for Bayesian phylogenetic inference.
    Höhna S; Drummond AJ
    Syst Biol; 2012 Jan; 61(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 21828081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Model parameterization, prior distributions, and the general time-reversible model in Bayesian phylogenetics.
    Zwickl D; Holder M
    Syst Biol; 2004 Dec; 53(6):877-88. PubMed ID: 15764557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An empirical examination of the standard errors of maximum likelihood phylogenetic parameters under the molecular clock via bootstrapping.
    Schrago CG
    Genet Mol Res; 2006 Mar; 5(1):233-41. PubMed ID: 16755514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Summarizing a posterior distribution of trees using agreement subtrees.
    Cranston KA; Rannala B
    Syst Biol; 2007 Aug; 56(4):578-90. PubMed ID: 17654363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian mixed models and the phylogeny of pitvipers (Viperidae: Serpentes).
    Castoe TA; Parkinson CL
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2006 Apr; 39(1):91-110. PubMed ID: 16504544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Polytomies and Bayesian phylogenetic inference.
    Lewis PO; Holder MT; Holsinger KE
    Syst Biol; 2005 Apr; 54(2):241-53. PubMed ID: 16012095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is there a star tree paradox?
    Kolaczkowski B; Thornton JW
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Oct; 23(10):1819-23. PubMed ID: 16837562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toward understanding the distribution of Laurasian frogs: a test of Savage's biogeographical hypothesis using the genus Bombina.
    Zheng Y; Fu J; Li S
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2009 Jul; 52(1):70-83. PubMed ID: 19348953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fundamental differences between the methods of maximum likelihood and maximum posterior probability in phylogenetics.
    Svennblad B; Erixon P; Oxelman B; Britton T
    Syst Biol; 2006 Feb; 55(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 16507528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.