These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18985037)

  • 21. Gene expression profiling reveals Ki-67 associated proliferation signature in human glioblastoma.
    Jin Q; Zhang W; Qiu XG; Yan W; You G; Liu YW; Jiang T; Wang L
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Sep; 124(17):2584-8. PubMed ID: 22040407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Hunting for robust gene signature from cancer profiling data: sources of variability, different interpretations, and recent methodological developments.
    Xu JZ; Wong CW
    Cancer Lett; 2010 Oct; 296(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 20579805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Integration of gene signatures using biological knowledge.
    Blazadonakis ME; Zervakis ME; Kafetzopoulos D
    Artif Intell Med; 2011 Sep; 53(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 21767937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Gene expression profiling in uveal melanoma: two regions on 3p related to prognosis.
    van Gils W; Lodder EM; Mensink HW; Kiliç E; Naus NC; Brüggenwirth HT; van Ijcken W; Paridaens D; Luyten GP; de Klein A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Oct; 49(10):4254-62. PubMed ID: 18552379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A gene expression signature identifies two prognostic subgroups of basal breast cancer.
    Sabatier R; Finetti P; Cervera N; Lambaudie E; Esterni B; Mamessier E; Tallet A; Chabannon C; Extra JM; Jacquemier J; Viens P; Birnbaum D; Bertucci F
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Apr; 126(2):407-20. PubMed ID: 20490655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The prognostic value of temporal in vitro and in vivo derived hypoxia gene-expression signatures in breast cancer.
    Starmans MH; Chu KC; Haider S; Nguyen F; Seigneuric R; Magagnin MG; Koritzinsky M; Kasprzyk A; Boutros PC; Wouters BG; Lambin P
    Radiother Oncol; 2012 Mar; 102(3):436-43. PubMed ID: 22356756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Improved breast cancer prognosis through the combination of clinical and genetic markers.
    Sun Y; Goodison S; Li J; Liu L; Farmerie W
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 17130137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Gene-expression signatures in oncology diagnostics.
    Mazumder A; Wang Y
    Pharmacogenomics; 2006 Dec; 7(8):1167-73. PubMed ID: 17184204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using logistic regression to improve the prognostic value of microarray gene expression data sets: application to early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the lung and triple negative breast carcinoma.
    Mount DW; Putnam CW; Centouri SM; Manziello AM; Pandey R; Garland LL; Martinez JD
    BMC Med Genomics; 2014 Jun; 7():33. PubMed ID: 24916928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A simple but highly effective approach to evaluate the prognostic performance of gene expression signatures.
    Starmans MH; Fung G; Steck H; Wouters BG; Lambin P
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e28320. PubMed ID: 22163293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Identification of a proliferation signature related to survival in nodal peripheral T-cell lymphomas.
    Cuadros M; Dave SS; Jaffe ES; Honrado E; Milne R; Alves J; Rodríguez J; Zajac M; Benitez J; Staudt LM; Martinez-Delgado B
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Aug; 25(22):3321-9. PubMed ID: 17577022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dual prognostic role of 2-oxoglutarate-dependent oxygenases in ten cancer types: implications for cell cycle regulation and cell adhesion maintenance.
    Chang WH; Forde D; Lai AG
    Cancer Commun (Lond); 2019 Apr; 39(1):23. PubMed ID: 31036064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Risk classification of cancer survival using ANN with gene expression data from multiple laboratories.
    Chen YC; Ke WC; Chiu HW
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 May; 48():1-7. PubMed ID: 24631783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Can survival prediction be improved by merging gene expression data sets?
    Yasrebi H; Sperisen P; Praz V; Bucher P
    PLoS One; 2009 Oct; 4(10):e7431. PubMed ID: 19851466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prediction of cancer outcome with microarrays: a multiple random validation strategy.
    Michiels S; Koscielny S; Hill C
    Lancet; 2005 Feb 5-11; 365(9458):488-92. PubMed ID: 15705458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Including network knowledge into Cox regression models for biomarker signature discovery.
    Fröhlich H
    Biom J; 2014 Mar; 56(2):287-306. PubMed ID: 24430933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Improve survival prediction using principal components of gene expression data.
    Shen YJ; Huang SG
    Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2006 May; 4(2):110-9. PubMed ID: 16970550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. HiFreSP: A novel high-frequency sub-pathway mining approach to identify robust prognostic gene signatures.
    Li M; Zhao J; Li X; Chen Y; Feng C; Qian F; Liu Y; Zhang J; He J; Ai B; Ning Z; Liu W; Bai X; Han X; Wu Z; Xu X; Tang Z; Pan Q; Xu L; Li C; Wang Q; Li E
    Brief Bioinform; 2020 Jul; 21(4):1411-1424. PubMed ID: 31350847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative analysis of molecular signatures reveals a hybrid approach in breast cancer: Combining the Nottingham Prognostic Index with gene expressions into a hybrid signature.
    Tschodu D; Ulm B; Bendrat K; Lippoldt J; Gottheil P; Käs JA; Niendorf A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0261035. PubMed ID: 35143511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A new vision of evaluating gene expression signatures.
    Lai HM; Özturk C; Albrecht A; Steinhöfel K
    Comput Biol Chem; 2015 Aug; 57():54-60. PubMed ID: 25748535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.