491 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18985633)
1. End-to-end versus end-to-side stapled anastomoses after anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Brisinda G; Vanella S; Cadeddu F; Civello IM; Brandara F; Nigro C; Mazzeo P; Marniga G; Maria G
J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 99(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 18985633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Defunctioning loop ileostomy with low anterior resection for distal rectal cancer: should we make an ileostomy as a routine procedure? A prospective randomized study.
Chude GG; Rayate NV; Patris V; Koshariya M; Jagad R; Kawamoto J; Lygidakis NJ
Hepatogastroenterology; 2008; 55(86-87):1562-7. PubMed ID: 19102343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Similar outcome after colonic pouch and side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial.
Machado M; Nygren J; Goldman S; Ljungqvist O
Ann Surg; 2003 Aug; 238(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 12894014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transabdominal anastomosis after low anterior resection: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing long-term results between side-to-end anastomosis and colonic J-pouch.
Jiang JK; Yang SH; Lin JK
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Nov; 48(11):2100-8; discussion 2108-10. PubMed ID: 16132480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multimedia article. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.
Selvindos PB; Ho YH
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1710-1. PubMed ID: 18679748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abdominal stapled side-to-end anastomosis (Baker type) in low and high anterior resection: experiences and results in 69 consecutive patients at a regional general hospital in Japan.
Nakada I; Kawasaki S; Sonoda Y; Watanabe Y; Tabuchi T
Colorectal Dis; 2004 May; 6(3):165-70. PubMed ID: 15109380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer.
Rullier E; Laurent C; Garrelon JL; Michel P; Saric J; Parneix M
Br J Surg; 1998 Mar; 85(3):355-8. PubMed ID: 9529492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A meta-analysis comparing conventional end-to-end anastomosis vs. other anastomotic configurations after resection in Crohn's disease.
Simillis C; Purkayastha S; Yamamoto T; Strong SA; Darzi AW; Tekkis PP
Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Oct; 50(10):1674-87. PubMed ID: 17682822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Side-to-side stapled anastomosis strongly reduces anastomotic leak rates in Crohn's disease surgery.
Resegotti A; Astegiano M; Farina EC; Ciccone G; Avagnina G; Giustetto A; Campra D; Fronda GR
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Mar; 48(3):464-8. PubMed ID: 15719193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Risk factors and the management of anastomotic leakage after anus-preserving operation for rectal cancer].
Tai JD; Liu YS; Wang GY
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Mar; 10(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 17380457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single and double stapled anastomoses in rectal cancer surgery; a retrospective study on the safety of the technique and its indication.
Chiarugi M; Buccianti P; Sidoti F; Franceschi M; Goletti O; Cavina E
Acta Chir Belg; 1996 Feb; 96(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 8629386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Colorectal stapled anastomosis: results after anterior resection of the rectum for cancer].
Brigand C; Rohr S; Meyer C
Ann Chir; 2004 Oct; 129(8):427-32. PubMed ID: 15388371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Long-term result of low anterior resection with stapling devices for rectal cancer].
Pan ZZ; Wan DS; Ding PR; Li LR; Chen G; Wu XJ; Zhou ZW; Lu ZH; Wan XB; Li CM
Ai Zheng; 2004 Nov; 23(11 Suppl):1508-11. PubMed ID: 15566668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Multivariate analysis of risk factors associated with dehiscence of colorectal anastomosis after anterior or lower anterior resection for sigmoid or rectal cancer].
Luna-Pérez P; Rodríguez-Ramírez SE; Gutiérrez de la Barrera M; Labastida S
Rev Invest Clin; 2002; 54(6):501-8. PubMed ID: 12685217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery].
Funariu G; Pop CE; Ionescu C; Scurtu R; Dindelegan G
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2001; 96(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 12731158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A diverting stoma is not necessary when performing a handsewn coloanal anastomosis for lower rectal cancer.
Huh JW; Park YA; Sohn SK
Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Jul; 50(7):1040-6. PubMed ID: 17525861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for rectal cancer.
Lee MR; Hong CW; Yoon SN; Lim SB; Park KJ; Park JG
Hepatogastroenterology; 2006; 53(71):682-6. PubMed ID: 17086868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of sphincter-saving operation for rectal cancer without protective stoma and pelvic drain, and risk factors for anastomotic leakage.
Lohsiriwat V; Lohsiriwat D; Boonnuch W; Chinswangwatanakul V; Akaraviputh T; Riansuwan W; Lert-akyamanee N
Dig Surg; 2008; 25(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 18577863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Abdominal trans-sphincter resection of the anus: new possibilities in the surgical management of deep rectal cancer, with preservation of the anal sphincter].
István G; Berki I; Kiss S; Faller J
Orv Hetil; 1998 Feb; 139(6):293-8. PubMed ID: 9497622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preservation of the continence function after intersphincteric resection using a prolapsing technique in the patients with low rectal cancer and its clinical prognosis.
Dai Y; Jiang JB; Bi DS; Jin ZT; Sun JZ; Hu SY
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Oct; 121(20):2016-20. PubMed ID: 19080267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]